Dog park at Arnett Park

Lives 30 feet from the proposed Arnett site — her bedroom window — and raised noise, waste maintenance, and severe parking pressure near apartments.

Warned about dog bites near the ballfield, vaccination monitoring, disease spread, and who would pay if the city faces a lawsuit.

Lives near Arnett Park; opposed the dog park after seeing the full proposal, citing eight full parking spots, a hazardous dead-end U-turn on Piedmont, no sidewalks, barking that echoes through the canyon, and homes within feet of the fence.

Her bedroom faces the proposed park; believes it would hurt property values and that her complex's gardeners already absorb garbage cleanup from ballgames.

25-year resident next to the park; asked whether the city has done a professional noise study for the quarry acoustics, whether alternative sites exist, and what ongoing costs would be.

Said neighbors were shocked there was no consultation before the proposal; argued a dog park would eliminate kids' play structure use and green space, that rules would be ignored (citing dogs in the dog-prohibited ballfield), and cited Municipal Code 10.04.150 on dogs disturbing the peace.

A 12-year Glen of Pacific Grove resident and retired Beverly Hills traffic commander; noted the deer habitat and owls and asked that the proposal go to the Traffic Safety Commission and that an environmental impact report be considered.

A recent condo buyer near the park; described the quiet, star-lit neighborhood and deer families, and said many residents oppose it and that living next to a dog park 'makes me sick.'

A new resident with a small dog said she struggled to find dog parks locally and strongly supports the project; suggested exploring community development block grants and state programs for future funding.

Lifelong pet owner who currently drives to Carmel Valley and Pacific Grove-area dog parks; emphasized the social community dog parks create and the need to separate large and small dogs.

Shared research on the Pachetti Dog Park in Seaside — a community-funded project approved by that city in 2010 with no city funds, now a regional resource — and reported an overwhelmingly positive Nextdoor survey of PG dog owners.

The potential donor flew in from San Diego to say he's committed a significant amount through the Community Foundation for Monterey County, credited PG Cares volunteers, and described how a dog park changed his life — urging the board to get behind it.

A Pacific Grove Cares representative described the effort as community recreation leadership and vision, noted 45 volunteers, local business support including Hayward Lumber, and said the group is there to partner with the board.

Learned of the item only the day before; asked whether parking had been considered on the site map and whether neighbors had been consulted — questions the board noted but didn't answer during comment.

Strongly supportive; described a January 1 incident where an off-leash dog chased deer at Robert Downs Field, killing a yearling, arguing a dog park would prevent such incidents, and said parking wouldn't be a problem in a walkable town.

Lives near Arnett Park; not opposed to a dog park but raised major concerns about parking on game days and the site's dead-end, uphill, one-way access behind apartments, questioning how walkable it really is.