Zoning

AP/TPD 26-0029 — 139 7th Street

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (5)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
6

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 13, 2026.

Public comments (6)

OpposedDoug McKnightOct 13, 2026

Said he learned of the project only a week before, called the house huge, and raised privacy, sight lines, fire-safety access gaps, demolition dust/asbestos, and whether the ADU will actually house locals.

Architectural Review Board — October 13, 2026 · 12:08 →
OpposedSusan GoldbeckOct 13, 2026

Urged the board to preserve the Retreat's Victorian character, saying the modern house is too large and intrusive on neighbors.

Architectural Review Board — October 13, 2026 · 18:04 →
OpposedRoseanne GouldOct 13, 2026

Said her 1920 house is already hemmed in by 'monster' homes with no privacy, and argued the proposed house is too big with only one garage parking space.

Architectural Review Board — October 13, 2026 · 19:00 →
SupportiveRupa DesaiOct 13, 2026

The owner said her large family needs the space, the project stays within zoning rules including the state-mandated ADU, and they want to be good neighbors.

Architectural Review Board — October 13, 2026 · 22:29 →
OpposedMegan HarrisOct 13, 2026

The rear neighbor said the house will loom over her property with no privacy, questioned whether the old cottage should have been on the historic inventory, and flagged a similar Carmel project by the same developers.

Architectural Review Board — October 13, 2026 · 24:23 →
OpposedKent SearyOct 13, 2026

An adjacent owner of 50 years called the six-bedroom project 'pure commercial' and said no one from the development team talked to any of the neighbors.

Architectural Review Board — October 13, 2026 · 28:54 →