Development

408 16th Street rebuild

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (7)

At a glance

Public comments
9
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Sep 10, 2026.

Public comments (9)

OpposedWilliam SiegfriedSep 10, 2026

Owner of 407 17th Street, he described the custom sunlight-designed bedroom he built during his parents' final years and said the new three-story house will destroy that ambient light.

Planning Commission Regular Meeting — September 10, 2026 · 1:48:22 →
OpposedStuart KiritzSep 10, 2026

Pointed out the 72% size increase and three-story height, and asked the commission to require design changes or continue the project to protect the neighbor's morning sunlight.

Planning Commission Regular Meeting — September 10, 2026 · 1:52:30 →
OpposedThad MumbertSep 10, 2026

Co-owner of 407 17th Street, he described losing blue sky, dappled morning light and property value if the 'very large cube' is built behind their cottage.

Planning Commission Regular Meeting — September 10, 2026 · 1:55:18 →
OpposedRobert GunnSep 10, 2026

A retired architect speaking for the neighborhood, he urged denial, arguing the massing violates design guidelines, that few three-story houses exist in Pacific Grove, and that a teardown should meet current zoning like a variance would require.

Planning Commission Regular Meeting — September 10, 2026 · 1:57:39 →
OpposedChristine HighlandSep 10, 2026

Owner of the restored Green Victorian at 611 Pine, she said the taller house would overlook her walled backyard and destroy her privacy, and that the Odoms never contacted or properly noticed her.

Planning Commission Regular Meeting — September 10, 2026 · 2:02:31 →
OpposedFrederick ReinfurtSep 10, 2026

A longtime friend of the 407 17th Street owners, he said the ARB report never addressed the undue-shade guideline and that restrictions exist to protect neighbors, not to burden them with a buyer's poor choice.

Planning Commission Regular Meeting — September 10, 2026 · 2:06:03 →
OpposedInga Lorenson DahmerSep 10, 2026

Said the house obviously doesn't fit the neighborhood and questioned why the commission no longer has legal counsel attending its meetings.

Planning Commission Regular Meeting — September 10, 2026 · 2:09:04 →
SupportiveNathan OdomSep 10, 2026

The project architect disputed testimony: he said the lot is 2,100 square feet per the 1992 survey, the project complies with all zoning except the roof-overhang use permit, and the sunlight and privacy impacts are overstated.

Planning Commission Regular Meeting — September 10, 2026 · 1:47:37 →
SupportiveBruce OdomSep 10, 2026

The property owner noted he submitted written comments and told the commission the neighbor at 406 16th Street raised no objection to the project.

Planning Commission Regular Meeting — September 10, 2026 · 1:46:27 →