Flock ALPR contract
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Flock ALPR surveillance contract renewal→At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 6
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 26, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Said she fears retaliation and ICE tracking from license plate cameras, cited cities that canceled Flock contracts, and urged the council to end the contract and not renew with any ALPR vendor.
City Council - Regular Meeting — October 26, 2026 · 3:01:10 →Fourth time speaking on Flock; shared her community pantry story and proposed a volunteer community care team as an alternative to surveillance-based policing.
City Council - Regular Meeting — October 26, 2026 · 3:07:50 →Said two weeks isn't enough time to make an informed call, urged a no vote on renewal so the city can study the issue properly, and stressed data-sharing as the key risk.
City Council - Regular Meeting — October 26, 2026 · 3:14:56 →Nurse and 29-year resident urged the council not to renew Flock, citing error-prone tech, lawsuit risk, and camera placement near a pharmacy and Title I school.
City Council - Regular Meeting — October 26, 2026 · 3:20:56 →Opposed the Flock contract on anti-tyranny grounds and raised concerns about a possible delay of the hearing to Thanksgiving week.
City Council - Regular Meeting — October 26, 2026 · 3:23:55 →Sharp Park resident said constant camera tracking makes him uncomfortable and urged the council not to renew the expiring Flock contract.
City Council - Regular Meeting — October 26, 2026 · 3:30:18 →