Coastal Crest appeal

Speaking as a Ramaytush descendant, asked the council to deny both appeal points, questioned the timing of the LCLUP certification, and urged scrutiny of the developer's track record.

Asked the council to deny the appeal, saying the quarry belongs to the community and criticizing the out-of-area developer.

Questioned the real purpose of a 1,225-unit all-affordable rental project and urged the council to follow the Planning Commission's denial.

Though a housing advocate and union representative, said the developer ignores the community and asked the council to deny the appeal.

Opposed the project citing coastal planning, Ramaytush ancestral land, and a sewage spill into Calera Creek showing infrastructure strain.

A former councilmember and 51-year quarry neighbor, argued the site was always intended for visitor-serving commercial use and urged denial.

Called the project a climate catastrophe in the making, urged rematriation of the indigenous site, and asked the council to deny the appeal.

Questioned the definition of affordable housing, cited coastal erosion changes since 1980, and asked the council to deny the appeal.

Urged denial of the appeal and upholding the director's determinations on the public vote and 2025 coastal plan.

Urged adoption of the resolution denying the appeal, saying the quarry's fragile, historic, and indigenous character earned its voter-approval status.

Urged denial, defending residents' voting rights against what she called circumventive legal arguments.

A renter who wants affordable housing, she still urged denial because the project avoids a public vote.