650 Cape Breton Drive
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
650 Cape Breton Drive illegal grading and rezoning→At a glance
- Public comments
- 11
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Apr 27, 2026.
Public comments (17)
She asked the Council to ensure the new non-rezoning option contains no loopholes, noting 215+ pages of public emails opposing rezoning.
City Council - Regular Meeting — April 27, 2026 · 1:13:53 →She opposed the rezoning outright, worried about inadequate notice of the new options and any precedent the 'not development' finding might set.
City Council - Regular Meeting — April 27, 2026 · 1:16:30 →He asked the Council to pass the non-rezoning option, hoping it clears title clouds and lets the property change hands.
City Council - Regular Meeting — April 27, 2026 · 1:13:38 →Called in asking to comment on 650 Cape Breton but was directed to the later public hearing.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 1:39:10 →Urged the city to drop the retroactive grading permit requirement instead of rezoning, and said applicants should disclose full future plans for the property.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 2:51:42 →A 40-year resident frustrated that promised trail access was never restored; asked the council to say no to the plan.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 2:54:34 →Described $27,000 in flood damage to her home from the church's blocked storm drain, intimidation by INC, and opposed approval.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 2:56:38 →Recounted the 2022 mass gathering and other negative INC interactions, asking for extensive evaluation of the owner's plans.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 3:00:00 →Speaking for friends on Cape Breton, saw selling the property as the best outcome but recognized the permit catch-22.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 3:03:13 →Recalled the property's stable-era heyday, worried about evacuation routes and clogged drains, and said the community doesn't trust the new owners.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 2:59:44 →Grew up at the stables; questioned why the church needs a carport and asked the city to listen to neighbors and restore the stables.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 3:09:14 →Questioned dry-season-only soil testing, cited endangered steelhead, and said the location is simply wrong for a church.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 3:09:07 →Said the church broke its word to the community and suggested granting the permit only at escrow closing if they sell.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 3:14:01 →Worried about the precedent for future approvals and noise/traffic disruption in a quiet neighborhood, citing a similar dispute in Los Gatos.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 3:16:05 →Asked for evidence of the staff's HPD coverage interpretation and argued this should be treated as violation abatement, not development.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 3:18:35 →Called the area ecologically sensitive and said the property has behaved like an event center or private club; warned approval could spiral.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 3:21:29 →The applicant explained the grading was a rogue project manager's doing (since removed), the church wants to comply with the city, and it has no other plans for the property beyond fixing the violation.
City Council - Regular Meeting — February 23, 2026 · 2:42:26 →