Charter amendment ballot measure
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Charter amendment headed toward November ballot→At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 3, 2026.
Public comments (9)
IBEW 569's policy director urged support for the charter amendment, saying Oceanside is currently out of compliance with state law and risking millions in infrastructure funding.
City Council — June 3, 2026 · 4:12:02 →Labor union representative supported placing the charter cleanup on the ballot to protect state infrastructure funding.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 3:25:47 →Union rep said Oceanside is out of compliance with state law and at risk of losing state funding; urged the ballot measure.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 3:26:45 →Journeyman electrician urged a yes vote, saying the measure preserves state funds for public works.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 3:27:59 →Spoke on behalf of Congressman Mike Levin, supporting the measure to preserve state infrastructure funding.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 3:27:49 →Building trades council leader said removing outdated charter language protects the city's infrastructure funding eligibility.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 3:30:10 →Political director urged the council to move the measure forward so voters can decide.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 3:32:01 →IBEW 569 policy director said over 100 members live in Oceanside and urged the ballot referral to protect infrastructure funding.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 3:33:00 →Painter union member urged full support for placing the measure on the November ballot.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 3:34:37 →