801-815 Mission Avenue project
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 20, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Wanted extremely low-income units, family-sized affordable units, senior/veteran set-asides, and a public meeting room; said the design looks generic.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 56:15 →Disappointed with only 23 affordable units; asked whether the number could rise to 60 given regional rents around $2,100 for one bedrooms.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 2:07:22 →Listed four asks: keep the 25% landscaping standard, go all-electric, adopt a real traffic-reduction (TDM) plan, and use bird-friendly design.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 2:08:21 →Thanked the developer for the affordable units but asked that at least two be made accessible for residents with disabilities.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 2:10:46 →Speaking for SAFER, urged denial until a mitigated negative declaration or EIR is prepared, citing unanalyzed construction air quality and diesel cancer risk.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 2:12:43 →Asked whether the developer has a philanthropic arm and how many homeless veterans it has housed.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 1:01:23 →Commended the developer's community outreach and noted it will be the first of roughly 3,000 apartments coming to the corridor, built to be owned and managed long-term.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 2:18:08 →Asked why more units aren't reserved for low-income seniors, citing AARP data that seniors are the fastest-growing homeless group.
City Council — May 20, 2026 · 2:20:02 →