California Record
Oakley
Public Safety

2603 Main Street Liquor (CUP 2026-001)

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (5)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 7, 2026.

Public comments (6)

SupportiveFathi MuflihiJul 7, 2026

The Colmena Market applicant walked through the store layout, 26-camera security system, and reconfigured resident gates, saying the store targets families, expects only about 5% of sales from alcohol, and won't sell cheap liquor.

Regular Meeting of the Oakley Planning Commission - Jul 7, 2026 · 14:32 →
OpposedSandi BothwickJul 7, 2026

A Twin Oaks senior resident opposed the liquor license, citing backwards traffic patterns, near-accidents at the shared gates, parking issues, and four years of problems at the complex finally settling down.

Regular Meeting of the Oakley Planning Commission - Jul 7, 2026 · 23:01 →
OpposedCathy AshfordMay 19, 2026

Spoke twice against the liquor permit, saying alcohol next to a senior building would be a nuisance, attract problems, and disturb the quiet life seniors moved there for.

Regular Meeting of the Oakley Planning Commission - May 19, 2026 · 3:34 →
OpposedLinda CarterMay 19, 2026

Said residents moved in expecting a quiet place and didn't realize a liquor-selling store would occupy the commercial space; asked the commission not to allow alcohol sales.

Regular Meeting of the Oakley Planning Commission - May 19, 2026 · 40:39 →
OpposedEve JacksonMay 19, 2026

An 88-year-old resident who said the problem is security, traffic in and out of the shared exit, and existing loitering — and asked why liquor is needed next door when it's sold nearby already.

Regular Meeting of the Oakley Planning Commission - May 19, 2026 · 46:35 →
OpposedRosetta SampsonMay 19, 2026

A four-year resident who described confusing, congested entrance and exit circulation, complained of riffraff and loitering already occurring, and asked that liquor not be sold without a security guard.

Regular Meeting of the Oakley Planning Commission - May 19, 2026 · 49:35 →