California Record
Mountain View
Transportation

Repeal and Reenact Article X (Transportation Demand Management)

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (1)Concerned (2)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 12, 2026.

Public comments (6)

MixedRobert CoxMay 12, 2026

Expressed support for the TDM ordinance expansion but raised concerns about unbundled parking and parking spillover in downtown.

City Council — May 12, 2026 · 1:20:58 →
SupportiveAlexander AmorosoMay 12, 2026

Supported the TDM measure, suggesting expanded public transit options and protection of green spaces to manage traffic and emissions.

City Council — May 12, 2026 · 1:24:32 →
SupportiveJames KuzmaMay 12, 2026

Spoke on behalf of Mountain View Yimby in support of the TDM ordinance, praising low-cost parking reduction tools while urging careful monitoring of ADT thresholds.

City Council — May 12, 2026 · 1:26:25 →
ConcernedKevin MaMay 12, 2026

Commented on housing costs, regulation impacts, and the need for local trip generation data rather than relying solely on standard manuals.

City Council — May 12, 2026 · 1:31:52 →
ConcernedKatie PatrickMay 12, 2026

Shared personal experiences living car-free and emphasized the critical need for secure, accessible bicycle storage in multifamily buildings.

City Council — May 12, 2026 · 1:34:05 →
OpposedKaren BerkeyMay 12, 2026

Expressed concern that parking reductions and unbundled parking in new developments exacerbate street parking shortages for families who rely on cars.

City Council — May 12, 2026 · 1:37:09 →