Biodiversity and Urban Forest Plan
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Biodiversity and Urban Forest Plan Draft Review→At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 23, 2026.
Public comments (20)
Praised the biodiversity plan and supported removing near-native definitions in favor of true local natives.
City Council — June 23, 2026 · 1:33:24 →Expressed support for expanding urban forest protections to private lands and developments.
City Council — June 23, 2026 · 1:44:53 →Thanked staff and council for revisions clarifying native versus non-native plants.
City Council — June 23, 2026 · 1:35:01 →Thanked staff and council for modifications and urged prioritizing local native plants.
City Council — June 23, 2026 · 1:36:46 →Praised the plan and emphasized that biodiversity anchors must rely on native plants.
City Council — June 23, 2026 · 1:40:05 →Supported definition changes ensuring focus on native plants for ecosystem diversity.
City Council — June 23, 2026 · 1:41:41 →Praised staff for integrating community feedback into the final biodiversity plan.
City Council — June 23, 2026 · 1:43:22 →Asked the council to adopt recommendations from the Bird Alliance and Green Spaces for robust implementation and habitat restoration.
City Council — April 28, 2026 · 48:17 →Proposed designating Cuesta Annex as an urban forest and increasing tree planting goals to 30% by 2030.
City Council — April 28, 2026 · 49:55 →Advocated for native tree planting and mandated shade for pedestrians and cyclists.
City Council — April 28, 2026 · 52:07 →Stressed the importance of protecting large, old native trees against development and utility pressures.
City Council — April 28, 2026 · 53:10 →Suggested increasing tree canopy targets more rapidly and exploring special zoning or state law advocacy to protect creek beds from development impacts.
City Council — April 28, 2026 · 25:51 →Praised the plan on behalf of the Santa Clara Valley Bird Alliance, emphasizing native species, adaptive management, and accountability.
City Council — April 28, 2026 · 27:47 →A biologist who urged prioritizing native plants and clear metrics, noting that non-native trees support far fewer caterpillars needed by local birds.
City Council — April 28, 2026 · 29:54 →Spoke on behalf of local planning coalitions about closing the gap between policy and implementation through operational language and green infrastructure standards.
City Council — April 28, 2026 · 32:32 →Thanked staff and expressed support for native plants and wildlife preservation.
City Council — April 28, 2026 · 43:04 →Suggested designating Cuesta Annex as an urban forest and increasing protections for heritage trees.
City Council — April 28, 2026 · 44:13 →Stressed the need to protect heritage trees and establish stronger accountability measures in the plan.
City Council — April 28, 2026 · 45:48 →Expressed views on the draft biodiversity and urban forest plan during public testimony.
Parks and Recreation Commission and Urban Forestry Board — January 21, 2026 · 0:00 →Provided public input on the updated draft plan.
Parks and Recreation Commission and Urban Forestry Board — January 21, 2026 · 0:00 →