Proposed McDonald's Restaurant at Ironwood and Pigeon Pass
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 16
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed May 14, 2026.
Public comments (16)
Stated that the neighborhood already has multiple McDonald's and severe traffic issues, and asked why a popular local restaurant like Jose's should be displaced.
Planning Commission · 12:16 →Criticized the commission for continuing the item and limiting immediate voice, arguing the project will bring noise, litter, and homelessness.
Planning Commission · 13:34 →Thanked the commission and stated she would return on May 28 to ensure her comments are part of the official record.
Planning Commission · 15:05 →Lives near the proposed site and expressed fear over homeless individuals trespassing on her property and the severe morning school traffic near Canyon Springs High School.
Planning Commission · 15:18 →Agreed with prior speakers that the project is unacceptable and promised to bring more residents to the May 28 meeting.
Planning Commission · 19:47 →Noted past pedestrian fatalities at the intersection and warned that placing a McDonald's near a cannabis dispensary is dangerous.
Planning Commission · 20:57 →A small business owner in the same complex who stated that security cuts have increased crime and homelessness, and a McDonald's would ruin their business.
Planning Commission · 36:17 →Highlighted that Moreno Valley already has numerous McDonald's locations and warned of noise pollution from a 24-hour drive-thru.
Planning Commission · 25:34 →Praised Jose's restaurant as a family staple and asked the commission not to alter the community's ambiance.
Planning Commission · 27:29 →Opposed the project, emphasizing the need for healthier food options and the preservation of Jose's.
Planning Commission · 28:22 →Questioned what data the city used to determine the need for another fast-food restaurant and asked about cumulative health impacts.
Planning Commission · 30:05 →Advised commissioners on how to make findings to deny the project if it conflicts with public health and safety.
Planning Commission · 34:08 →Questioned how many times an applicant can continue an item and criticized the procedural confusion regarding public comments.
Planning Commission · 57:57 →A plaza business owner who detailed ongoing security issues, transients, and property crimes in the shopping center.
Planning Commission · 36:15 →Voiced opposition due to traffic, school safety, and the value of preserving Jose's restaurant.
Planning Commission · 38:46 →Asked how much outreach the applicant conducted and encouraged them to take their project elsewhere.
Planning Commission · 43:07 →