Development

695 Bicknell Road appeal

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (2)

At a glance

Public comments
3
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 26, 2026.

Public comments (3)

OpposedDale DrummAug 26, 2026

The appellant, a former developer, asked the commission to require a five-foot second-story setback to break up the mass towering over his backyard and pool, arguing it follows the town's design guidelines.

Planning Commission — August 26, 2026 · 41:01 →
SupportiveMarjorie EddingtonAug 26, 2026

The property owner described five design changes made for the neighbor, the light study, arborist consultation, and structural reasons a five-foot setback isn't feasible, asking the commission to let the project proceed.

Planning Commission — August 26, 2026 · 47:35 →
OpposedMonique DrummAug 26, 2026

The appellant's wife explained the hill on their property limits usable space, that their gathering area sits near the addition, and that their 24,000-square-foot lot is mostly unusable hillside.

Planning Commission — August 26, 2026 · 1:00:04 →