Zoning
536 N. Santa Cruz Avenue sign exception
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Supportive (1)Opposed (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 2
- Last 30 days
- 0
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Sep 23, 2026.
Public comments (2)
SupportiveBret GranumSep 23, 2026
Presented ROEM's case: 30 employees moving into a 70-foot-wide blank-facade building, arguing 12-inch letters are illegibly small and offering to work on lighting timers.
Planning Commission — September 23, 2026 · 47:54 →OpposedSteve WoodSep 23, 2026
Opposed building-mounted halo-lit signs on safety and 'Las Vegas' grounds, suggesting they enlarge the existing monument sign instead.
Planning Commission — September 23, 2026 · 57:37 →