Development

16717 Chirco Drive appeal — rebuttal

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
1
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Sep 9, 2026.

Public comments (1)

OpposedMoha HajirostamSep 9, 2026

In rebuttal, the appellant argued his suggestions require no major redesign, disputed the applicant's neighborhood outreach claims, and said the rental status of his home is irrelevant to the privacy concerns.

Planning Commission — September 9, 2026 · 54:05 →