Development

116 Vallecitos Way two-story residence

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (5)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed May 13, 2026.

Public comments (6)

SupportiveMichelle MinerMay 13, 2026

The project designer presented 3D street studies, privacy screen plans with fast-growing plants, and design offsets meant to reduce massing.

Planning Commission — May 13, 2026 · 1:08:04 →
OpposedMargie EddingtonMay 13, 2026

A lifelong resident of 112 Vallecitos Way said the second story and balcony would look directly into her tenant's bedroom and living areas and asked for taller screening trees, balcony removal, and reduced height.

Planning Commission — May 13, 2026 · 1:23:48 →
OpposedDavid BaumMay 13, 2026

A 33-year resident three houses away urged downsizing, citing cul-de-sac parking and traffic, while expressing support for the owners as neighbors.

Planning Commission — May 13, 2026 · 1:28:59 →
OpposedDavid ForsterMay 13, 2026

The Bicknell Road neighbor behind the site raised sightlines to his master bedroom, asked for 12–14-foot screening trees, and objected to removal of a beloved Douglas fir.

Planning Commission — May 13, 2026 · 1:34:44 →
OpposedAileen GulesserianMay 13, 2026

Cited design inconsistency with neighborhood character, excessive height and windows, inadequate environmental review, and no story poles; asked for a single-story, split-level, or basement alternative within FAR.

Planning Commission — May 13, 2026 · 1:41:02 →
OpposedCliff FoersterMay 13, 2026

On Zoom, the 112 Vallecitos resident of 55 years raised height and size concerns, fence line changes, and loss of mountain views.

Planning Commission — May 13, 2026 · 1:44:31 →