Development

116 Vallecitos Way application

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (5)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 24, 2026.

Public comments (7)

SupportiveMichelle MinerJun 24, 2026

The designer walked through height cuts, the attic redesign, a solid balcony wall, and a landscape plan designed to block sightlines from neighboring homes.

Planning Commission — June 24, 2026 · 1:32:33 →
OpposedDr. Heather AkinJun 24, 2026

Lives in the ADU next door and asked the commission to deny, saying the two-story home would block her views and overlook her yard for years until trees grow.

Planning Commission — June 24, 2026 · 1:43:00 →
OpposedEileen G.Jun 24, 2026

Questioned whether a project exceeding guidelines should be approved and raised fire-hydrant distance concerns on the cul-de-sac.

Planning Commission — June 24, 2026 · 1:48:50 →
OpposedJan FreimannJun 24, 2026

A tenant at 112 Vallecitos said second-story windows and shadows would destroy his family's backyard privacy and raised asbestos concerns during demolition.

Planning Commission — June 24, 2026 · 1:51:02 →
OpposedMarjorie EddingtonJun 24, 2026

Longtime owner of 112 Vallecitos asked for raised or obscured windows to protect her tenants and said the home's height still overshadows the courtyard.

Planning Commission — June 24, 2026 · 1:54:41 →
OpposedDavid ForsterJun 24, 2026

Lives behind on Bicknell Road and asked for taller trees planted immediately so his bedroom privacy survives the multi-year build.

Planning Commission — June 24, 2026 · 1:59:34 →
SupportiveHailey LofgrenJun 24, 2026

The landscape designer explained she modeled sightlines from every neighbor's yard in 3D to place screening trees, offering ten-foot plantings.

Planning Commission — June 24, 2026 · 2:07:01 →