Measure GG
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Measure GG Paramedic Fee Increase (Prop 218)→At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 15, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Favored the cheaper Prop 218 route over an expensive ballot measure and asked whether the mailer could offer multiple dollar-amount options.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:30:01 →Strongly opposed — called it 'a death of a thousand taxes,' noted recent failed tax measures, and warned a $100,000 ballot spend could fail and leave the city at ground zero.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:31:27 →Not opposed to a modest increase but said the process must be fair — a Prop 218 protest-style vote forces people to show up to object, which she called inequitable.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:34:00 →Called the current $6.90 rate a bargain but asked how the shortfall splits between personnel costs and equipment, and about turnout differences between Prop 218 and a general-election ballot measure.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:37:02 →Asked whether this is a paramedic assessment like other cities' opt-in programs, and suggested the city look at neighboring cities' models and give residents a yes-or-no option.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 2:39:41 →Asked about population growth since 1980, repeat ambulance users, and the sample size behind the CARES survival data.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 1, 2026 · 1:30:35 →Asked whether ambulance service extends to non-residents visiting the city.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 1, 2026 · 1:33:10 →Asked for clarification on what the EMS billing revenue portion of the funding chart represents.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 1, 2026 · 48:03 →