CCW psychological evaluations
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 15, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Opposed dropping universal psych evals — pointed to liability questions if an approved holder commits a shooting and asked who pays for case-by-case evaluations.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:31:02 →Asked whether CCWs are still restricted to jewelers/business owners or open to anyone, and about required training.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:32:34 →Supported the change, citing the high cost burden CCW fees placed on La Verne applicants and arguing background checks and fingerprints are sufficient.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:33:30 →Supported the change, saying she trusts the chief's experience and discretion on when evaluations are needed.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:35:00 →Opposed the change — said waiving the universal requirement makes residents more vulnerable and asked who decides when an evaluation is required.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:35:31 →Supported the change, citing Texas open-carry statistics and the chief's ability to order evaluations when warranted.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:36:34 →Opposed the change — reminded the council the mayor himself pushed for universal evals three years ago as 'extreme precaution' and said $4,000-$6,000 a year is a small price for the added security.
City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:38:00 →