Public Safety

CCW psychological evaluations

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (3)Opposed (3)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 15, 2026.

Public comments (7)

OpposedKathy KalousekJun 15, 2026

Opposed dropping universal psych evals — pointed to liability questions if an approved holder commits a shooting and asked who pays for case-by-case evaluations.

City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:31:02 →
NeutralGene QuinnJun 15, 2026

Asked whether CCWs are still restricted to jewelers/business owners or open to anyone, and about required training.

City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:32:34 →
SupportiveLily BrainardJun 15, 2026

Supported the change, citing the high cost burden CCW fees placed on La Verne applicants and arguing background checks and fingerprints are sufficient.

City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:33:30 →
SupportivePatty SweetmuJun 15, 2026

Supported the change, saying she trusts the chief's experience and discretion on when evaluations are needed.

City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:35:00 →
OpposedYvonne GallegosJun 15, 2026

Opposed the change — said waiving the universal requirement makes residents more vulnerable and asked who decides when an evaluation is required.

City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:35:31 →
SupportiveRick BowenJun 15, 2026

Supported the change, citing Texas open-carry statistics and the chief's ability to order evaluations when warranted.

City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:36:34 →
OpposedStephen WiardJun 15, 2026

Opposed the change — reminded the council the mayor himself pushed for universal evals three years ago as 'extreme precaution' and said $4,000-$6,000 a year is a small price for the added security.

City Council (Regular) - Jun 15, 2026 · 1:38:00 →