Skyline Aggregates Quarry
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Skyline Aggregates Quarry approval→At a glance
- Public comments
- 29
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 25, 2026.
Public comments (29)
Lifelong resident and contractor said the county is 'dying' for jobs and that he'd otherwise haul aggregate from out of the area; praised Hat Creek's clean operation and urged unanimous approval.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:02:09 →Warder Farms family member urged unanimous approval as a turning point for rural Lassen County's economy.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:05:32 →Argued government's economic role is providing consistent rules, and that Thompson followed every step and deserves approval.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:08:30 →Born-and-raised resident said the project is the base of growth the county has watched slip away.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:11:32 →New local radio station owner said he researched the project heavily and urged approval, warning the tax base and investment leave if the county says no.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:15:35 →Business owner and volunteer praised Hat Creek's community giving and urged support for family-sustaining jobs.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:18:39 →The only female heavy-equipment operator at Hat Creek's pits described three years of mentorship and career growth at the company.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:20:59 →Stone Co Construction employee described decades of subcontracting with Hat Creek and the rigor of the EIR process.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:23:02 →Trucking-family worker said Hat Creek sustains his job and his father's and brother's independent trucking businesses.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:35:59 →Former supervisor said the county needs jobs now so young people like his daughter don't have to leave.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:38:00 →Rancher noted the company asks for no loans or grants — just the chance to invest its own money in a needed product.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:40:26 →Feather River College superintendent said local aggregate would keep taxpayer money local on upcoming campus construction and offered CDL and environmental partnerships.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:43:12 →Longtime resident living near the site said she hears more noise from Bass Hill than the quarry area and urged unanimous approval.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:46:17 →A local vendor of 35 years said more quarry jobs mean more store hours and staffing.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:48:51 →Grew up next to a comparable quarry in Gardnerville, Nevada and said there was never a dust or noise complaint.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:49:36 →Drove from Redding to call the project a model of rural economic development across business, community and workforce legs.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:51:17 →Thompson's business partner told how the two left small towns, built careers, and came home to bring aggregate jobs back to Lassen County.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:56:15 →Small business owner since 1982 said he'd welcome a quarry next to his own place and urged unanimous approval.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 3:00:56 →Cited the Plumas Healthcare board's unanimous opposition to a similar Hat Creek mine near Portola and asked the board to consider whether they'd accept it near their own families — he attended with his mother, a Banner Lassen cancer patient.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 3:04:31 →Former mill-town resident raised silica dust, blasting vibration, sensitive receptors and water protection concerns.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 3:08:01 →Retired respiratory therapist of 42 years said silicosis, asthma and COPD risks terrify her and asked that they be mitigated.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 3:12:08 →Said she agrees with the economics but the location near town is the problem; the loss of the valley's scenic view is significant and unavoidable under the county's own plan, and she warned that the permit runs with the land if the owner ever changes.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 3:13:53 →Asked how the class-one walking/biking path along Skyline Road will be protected when the road widens to four lanes.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 3:17:39 →Wondered how truck and equipment emissions will behave in Susanville's winter inversion layers.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 3:19:45 →Conceded the jobs and revenue but said it's 'just too bad it's in town,' quoting the EIR's need for an overriding consideration on unavoidable impacts.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 3:21:03 →Asked why the MOU with the Susanville Indian Rancheria is confidential and whether tribal members — not just leadership — had input.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 3:23:25 →Neutral speaker who wanted to know the wind patterns and how far dust would carry toward Susanville neighborhoods.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:54:02 →Longtime CDL driver asked which direction trucks will turn onto Skyline Road and questioned safety at the 55 mph zone with two roadside memorials already there.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:58:03 →Twenty-seven additional speakers in favor and further opposition speakers appeared; a letter of support from Leann Wood was read into the record by Supervisor Ingram.
Board of Supervisors — August 25, 2026 · 2:01:40 →