California Record
Lake Forest
Development

Redevelopment of 26200 Enterprise Way into Industrial Building

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (9)Opposed (6)

At a glance

Public comments
15
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 4, 2026.

Public comments (15)

SupportiveAmy SmithJun 4, 2026

Expressed support on behalf of CARE California, noting the developer's commitment to quality design, noise walls, and bike lane improvements.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 49:27 →
SupportiveJuan SerratoJun 4, 2026

Expressed support on behalf of LiUNA, highlighting good-paying construction jobs and modern energy-efficient facilities.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 50:26 →
SupportiveDaniel OsborneJun 4, 2026

Expressed support on behalf of Ironworkers Local 433, praising the developer's commitment to a skilled and trained workforce.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 51:27 →
OpposedXunha ZahnJun 4, 2026

Strongly opposed the warehouse project as a resident of the Meadows, citing increased noise, pollution, traffic congestion, and health risks for thousands of nearby residents.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 52:49 →
OpposedSunny WuJun 4, 2026

Opposed the project, arguing that industrial operations and heavy truck traffic do not belong immediately adjacent to established residential neighborhoods.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 55:56 →
OpposedJane ZhaoJun 4, 2026

Meadows resident who opposed the warehouse project, citing diminished quality of life, diesel emissions, noise, and lower property values.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 58:12 →
OpposedMindy LeeJun 4, 2026

Meadows resident opposing the 24-hour warehouse operation due to traffic congestion, noise, air pollution, and unknown tenants.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 1:05:02 →
OpposedLynn ZhuJun 4, 2026

Meadows resident opposed to the project, highlighting traffic strain, continuous industrial noise, and public health impacts.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 1:08:49 →
OpposedSharon HuJun 4, 2026

Retired resident opposed to the 24-hour industrial operations near homes, citing recent chemical incidents as a warning of industrial risks.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 1:22:09 →
SupportiveTom KazarianJun 4, 2026

Local resident and business family member who spoke in favor of the project, citing property rights and appropriate mitigation measures.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 2:26:18 →
SupportiveJimmy ElrodJun 4, 2026

Representing the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters, expressed strong support for local jobs and the developer's labor agreement.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 2:37:16 →
SupportiveJesse TorresJun 4, 2026

Local union carpenter speaking in favor of the project, emphasizing local employment opportunities and fair wages.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 2:38:58 →
SupportiveChris DankesJun 4, 2026

Representing UA Local 582 plumbers and pipefitters, supported the project for local construction jobs and superior water efficiency.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 2:54:17 →
SupportiveRandy WetmoreJun 4, 2026

Representing Ironworkers Local 416, spoke in favor of modernizing the site and providing local jobs.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 3:01:24 →
SupportiveJason BaezJun 4, 2026

LiUNA member who spoke in favor of the project, highlighting strict California truck emission regulations and comprehensive EIR mitigation.

Planning Commission - Regular Meeting - Jun 4, 2026 · 3:14:44 →