RZNE-0014-2026 no-net-loss rezoning
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 4
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 19, 2026.
Public comments (4)
Speaking for the Kennedy Commission, asked the city to add a 20% affordability requirement in the overlay zones and questioned the legality of the overlays and the mixed-use designation of Site N.
City Council / Planning Agency - Aug 19, 2026 · 48:30 →Chair of Welcoming Neighbors Home; concerned the city is giving away leverage by allowing high-density by-right housing without requiring affordability, and questioned housing next to the freeway.
City Council / Planning Agency - Aug 19, 2026 · 52:24 →Argued 30 units/acre doesn't pencil for for-sale product and asked the density range be amended to 20-80 units per acre.
City Council / Planning Agency - Aug 19, 2026 · 55:30 →Executive Director of the Kennedy Commission; argued the proposal repeats past mistakes by upzoning without capturing affordable units, warning the city will face no-net-loss again in a few years.
City Council / Planning Agency - Aug 19, 2026 · 57:02 →