Development

Goodwill store at 1551 Sycamore Avenue

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (6)

At a glance

Public comments
9
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jul 28, 2026.

Public comments (9)

OpposedEric WilliamsJul 28, 2026

Opposed the Goodwill, calling it a branding and reputation problem for the city and saying Hercules' scarce retail space should go to almost anything else.

City Council — July 28, 2026 · 1:16:01 →
OpposedDarlene AlmeidaJul 28, 2026

Said she didn't believe Goodwill's promises, citing the documented history of illegal dumping at the Rodeo store, and asked why the company doesn't employ adults with disabilities.

City Council — July 28, 2026 · 1:19:30 →
SupportiveBill BarronJul 28, 2026

The building's owner (North First Street Properties) described extensive due diligence, visits to Goodwill's Arizona operations and new Fairfield store, and said he's convinced this is a different, well-run Goodwill.

City Council — July 28, 2026 · 1:22:50 →
SupportiveCheryl WrightJul 28, 2026

A longtime resident who was initially skeptical but said she was impressed by the presentation and welcomes Goodwill to Hercules.

City Council — July 28, 2026 · 1:26:04 →
OpposedDiana AbayaJul 28, 2026

Argued the site is one of the city's last commercial parcels and should be split for restaurants, breweries, or local businesses that would generate far more tax revenue.

City Council — July 28, 2026 · 1:27:32 →
OpposedGail OsanaJul 28, 2026

Opposed the location, saying Hercules should be strategic about limited commercial space and prioritize restaurants, healthcare, and retail that keep tax dollars local.

City Council — July 28, 2026 · 1:30:08 →
OpposedMariaJul 28, 2026

Warned Hercules could become the regional dumping ground as nearby Goodwill locations close, raised vermin and safety concerns, and argued the drive-up donation feature fails the compatibility finding.

City Council — July 28, 2026 · 1:32:05 →
MixedCassandra (last name not given)Jul 6, 2026

A Hercules resident who lives near the shopping center said she's excited something new may fill the long-empty building but feels there are many better options for the site.

Planning Commission — July 6, 2026 · 25:35 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentJul 6, 2026

A caller on Zoom argued the city shouldn't act out of fear that this is the only interested tenant, said vacancy doesn't equal blight, warned that signage won't stop illegal dumping, and urged the commission to test the project against general plan findings.

Planning Commission — July 6, 2026 · 28:50 →