California Record
Glendale
Development

Multi-Family Housing Development at 2817 Montrose Avenue

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)Opposed (4)

At a glance

Public comments
12
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 13, 2026.

Public comments (12)

OpposedJane DutfieldAug 13, 2026

Expressed concern that the four-story building is too tall for the neighborhood and that street parking is already inadequate.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:03:39 →
OpposedBella Da DivanyaAug 13, 2026

Objected to the project due to loss of light, privacy issues for adjacent bedroom windows, and increased traffic and density.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:07:06 →
SupportiveRubik OvanesianAug 13, 2026

Supported the project, praising the architect's handling of a difficult sloping site and noting the project provides extra parking stalls.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:11:01 →
SupportiveHenry AbariAug 13, 2026

Expressed full support for the modern design, affordable housing addition, and proximity to mass transit and local shopping.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:14:01 →
OpposedEmily MachicatoAug 13, 2026

Raised concerns about driveway placement, potential crashes, parking deficits, and building height.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:16:30 →
MixedGrant MichaelsAug 13, 2026

Spoke on behalf of the neighborhood association, supporting the project conditionally if adequate landscaping and privacy screening are provided.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:19:27 →
SupportiveShane LeeAug 13, 2026

Strongly supported the project on behalf of Glendale YIMBY, urging immediate approval to address the housing crisis.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:22:53 →
SupportiveMike BorisovAug 13, 2026

Urged approval of the housing project, arguing that supply constraints drive up housing costs and that new housing benefits the community.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:25:49 →
MixedLisa MorrisAug 13, 2026

Expressed appreciation for the oak tree preservation but suggested a Craftsman design style to match neighborhood stones.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:28:47 →
MixedAlan DishAug 13, 2026

Supported the project in principle while acknowledging neighbor concerns about property values and neighborhood character.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:33:09 →
SupportiveJanAug 13, 2026

Expressed frustration with delays in the review process and urged the board to approve housing quickly during a crisis.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:03:39 →
OpposedSean GabraAug 13, 2026

Expressed concern about building height, driveway safety, and parking congestion on behalf of neighboring residents.

Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:39:21 →