California Record
Glendale
Development

High-Density Apartment Development at Foothill and New York

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (7)Opposed (20)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
28
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 3, 2026.

Public comments (28)

OpposedYoung ChungJun 3, 2026

Expressed concern over parking shortages and street congestion caused by the proposed apartment building.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 1:54:44 →
OpposedMarianne OrozcoJun 3, 2026

Highlighted severe street parking overflow and speeding traffic issues near Foothill and New York.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 1:59:35 →
OpposedYvonne WolfJun 3, 2026

Warned about potential impacts on emergency water reservoir pump access and aging sewer line capacity.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:02:00 →
OpposedMark WeaverJun 3, 2026

Expressed alarm over excavation stability downslope from the New York water reservoir.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:06:28 →
ConcernedRoxanne MyersJun 3, 2026

Requested thorough review of geotechnical reports and reservoir proximity before project approval.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:06:44 →
OpposedKevin WilbyJun 3, 2026

Criticized the project for ignoring hillside ordinances and creating extreme evacuation dangers during wildfires.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:06:34 →
OpposedKarenJun 3, 2026

Shared terrifying experiences from past wildfires and argued that large developments belong on major commercial corridors like San Fernando Road, not foothills.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:11:50 →
OpposedMaria KleinJun 3, 2026

Pointed out that the area sits in an indirect wildfire exposure zone prone to flying embers and gridlock.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:13:25 →
OpposedSabine CybermanJun 3, 2026

Expressed concern about cascading traffic bottlenecks when trying to evacuate from mountain cul-de-sacs.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:18:46 →
OpposedLynn LahrJun 3, 2026

Noted that numerous schools feed into Foothill Boulevard, creating existing congestion that the project will worsen.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:20:19 →
OpposedMark MaitlandJun 3, 2026

Voiced frustration that planning codes and community character are being overridden by developer lawyers.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:22:00 →
OpposedRebecca GoodmanJun 3, 2026

Detailed how nearby school evacuations during emergencies would collide with neighborhood residents fleeing.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:24:38 →
OpposedStuart BilesJun 3, 2026

Warned that multiple upcoming developments will destroy the suburban lifestyle of La Crescenta.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:27:04 →
SupportivePhilip ChowJun 3, 2026

Expressed strong support for the project, arguing that Glendale urgently needs more housing.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:28:57 →
SupportiveKyle PagosianJun 3, 2026

Urged the commission to follow state objective standards to avoid costly legal battles.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:28:51 →
OpposedJim TchaikovskyJun 3, 2026

Shared firefighting experience regarding panic and gridlock during major Southern California wildfires.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:30:03 →
SupportiveShane LeeJun 3, 2026

Voiced strong support for the affordable housing project as chapter president of Glendale YIMBY.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:36:20 →
OpposedUnidentified ResidentJun 3, 2026

Expressed frustration with severe traffic conditions near the proposed site.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 4:24:10 →
OpposedCarrie LewinJun 3, 2026

Cited city evacuation modeling showing streets already over capacity during emergencies.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:40:30 →
OpposedHeather ParkerJun 3, 2026

Shared multi-generational family experiences with foothill disasters and evacuation difficulties.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:45:22 →
OpposedVahe GassarianJun 3, 2026

Noted frequent traffic accidents at the Foothill and New York intersection due to school traffic.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:24:21 →
SupportiveYousefiJun 3, 2026

Voiced support for revitalizing the commercial corridor with modern housing for younger generations.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:39:35 →
OpposedRobert BrownJun 3, 2026

Described morning and afternoon school traffic backups and invited commissioners to visit the site.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:53:48 →
SupportiveAris BabayanJun 3, 2026

Supported the project to address housing shortages and revitalize an underutilized commercial property.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:55:20 →
SupportiveMichael StaubinJun 3, 2026

Urged approval to help younger generations afford housing in the community.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:58:34 →
OpposedBrenda RochaJun 3, 2026

Expressed concern that increased traffic threatens pedestrian safety during morning and evening walks.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:59:44 →
OpposedJean CatalanJun 3, 2026

Called a five-story building an atrocity that will overcrowd the neighborhood and reservoir area.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:59:59 →
SupportiveDavid BilletJun 3, 2026

Urged the commission to approve the vetted project and avoid wasting taxpayer money on delays.

Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:47:43 →