development
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
economic development award→At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 25, 2026.
Public comments (73)
Warning about the massive housing development potential under SB 79 tied to dedicated bus lanes and the associated strain on infrastructure.
City Council - Aug 25, 2026 · 4:01:05 →Praised the Spanish Colonial design and family-sized three-bedroom units, urging approval.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:25:49 →Expressed opposition to the Hermosa Avenue project due to excessive height, four stories, loss of oak trees, and lot coverage.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 2:52:16 →Agreed with prior testimony regarding the excessive scale and tree removal on Hermosa Avenue.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:28:47 →Expressed strong opposition to the four-story height, traffic congestion, and destruction of mature oak trees.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 3:00:08 →Expressed concern that the four-story building is too tall for the neighborhood and that street parking is already inadequate.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:03:39 →Objected to the project due to loss of light, privacy issues for adjacent bedroom windows, and increased traffic and density.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:07:06 →Supported the project, praising the architect's handling of a difficult sloping site and noting the project provides extra parking stalls.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:11:01 →Expressed full support for the modern design, affordable housing addition, and proximity to mass transit and local shopping.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:14:01 →Raised concerns about driveway placement, potential crashes, parking deficits, and building height.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:16:30 →Spoke on behalf of the neighborhood association, supporting the project conditionally if adequate landscaping and privacy screening are provided.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:19:27 →Strongly supported the project on behalf of Glendale YIMBY, urging immediate approval to address the housing crisis.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:22:53 →Urged approval of the housing project, arguing that supply constraints drive up housing costs and that new housing benefits the community.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:25:49 →Expressed appreciation for the oak tree preservation but suggested a Craftsman design style to match neighborhood stones.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:28:47 →Supported the project in principle while acknowledging neighbor concerns about property values and neighborhood character.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:33:09 →Expressed frustration with delays in the review process and urged the board to approve housing quickly during a crisis.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:03:39 →Expressed concern about building height, driveway safety, and parking congestion on behalf of neighboring residents.
Design Review Board - Aug 13, 2026 · 1:39:21 →Commented on local housing politics and election outcomes, encouraging support for housing production.
City Council - Jul 21, 2026 · 2:19:50 →Advocated for funding an annual quality of life report and suggested partnering with the YMCA to provide swimming pool and recreation access for children in park-poor areas.
Joint Meeting: Glendale City Council and Glendale Housing Authority - Jun 9, 2026 · 52:10 →Advocated for housing and transit, urging the council not to delay upzoning around BRT stops and arguing that multi-family housing and apartments are beneficial.
City Council - Jun 9, 2026 · 1:37:31 →Expressed strong support for the project, arguing that Glendale urgently needs more housing.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:28:57 →Expressed alarm over excavation stability downslope from the New York water reservoir.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:06:28 →Requested thorough review of geotechnical reports and reservoir proximity before project approval.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:06:44 →Criticized the project for ignoring hillside ordinances and creating extreme evacuation dangers during wildfires.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:06:34 →Shared terrifying experiences from past wildfires and argued that large developments belong on major commercial corridors like San Fernando Road, not foothills.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:11:50 →Pointed out that the area sits in an indirect wildfire exposure zone prone to flying embers and gridlock.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:13:25 →Expressed concern about cascading traffic bottlenecks when trying to evacuate from mountain cul-de-sacs.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:18:46 →Noted that numerous schools feed into Foothill Boulevard, creating existing congestion that the project will worsen.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:20:19 →Voiced frustration that planning codes and community character are being overridden by developer lawyers.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:22:00 →Detailed how nearby school evacuations during emergencies would collide with neighborhood residents fleeing.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:24:38 →Warned that multiple upcoming developments will destroy the suburban lifestyle of La Crescenta.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:27:04 →Urged the commission to follow state objective standards to avoid costly legal battles.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:28:51 →Shared firefighting experience regarding panic and gridlock during major Southern California wildfires.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:30:03 →Voiced strong support for the affordable housing project as chapter president of Glendale YIMBY.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:36:20 →Expressed frustration with severe traffic conditions near the proposed site.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 4:24:10 →Cited city evacuation modeling showing streets already over capacity during emergencies.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:40:30 →Shared multi-generational family experiences with foothill disasters and evacuation difficulties.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:45:22 →Noted frequent traffic accidents at the Foothill and New York intersection due to school traffic.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:24:21 →Voiced support for revitalizing the commercial corridor with modern housing for younger generations.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:39:35 →Described morning and afternoon school traffic backups and invited commissioners to visit the site.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:53:48 →Supported the project to address housing shortages and revitalize an underutilized commercial property.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:55:20 →Urged approval to help younger generations afford housing in the community.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:58:34 →Expressed concern that increased traffic threatens pedestrian safety during morning and evening walks.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:59:44 →Called a five-story building an atrocity that will overcrowd the neighborhood and reservoir area.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:59:59 →Urged the commission to approve the vetted project and avoid wasting taxpayer money on delays.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:47:43 →Expressed concern over parking shortages and street congestion caused by the proposed apartment building.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 1:54:44 →Highlighted severe street parking overflow and speeding traffic issues near Foothill and New York.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 1:59:35 →Warned about potential impacts on emergency water reservoir pump access and aging sewer line capacity.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 2:02:00 →Argued that open state water board investigation cases on the property mean it is on the Cortese list and ineligible for CEQA exemptions.
Planning Commission - Jun 3, 2026 · 1:59:40 →Raised serious concerns regarding narrow street access, emergency vehicle delays, and environmental particulate risks from grading.
Design Review Board - May 28, 2026 · 1:58:47 →Noted that Hillcroft Road is extremely narrow and the proposed home is out of character with the neighborhood.
Design Review Board - May 28, 2026 · 2:02:33 →Expressed concern over the geotechnical engineer's probation status and neighborhood safety.
Design Review Board - May 28, 2026 · 2:02:33 →Argued the home does not fit the neighborhood and questioned construction safety and access.
Design Review Board - May 28, 2026 · 2:10:00 →Highlighted severe drop-offs and drainage concerns along the border with his property.
Design Review Board - May 28, 2026 · 2:13:12 →Voiced concerns about dust allergies, fire safety, and street congestion.
Design Review Board - May 28, 2026 · 2:16:15 →Asked about road repair plans, developer insurance, and construction timeline.
Design Review Board - May 28, 2026 · 2:18:38 →Noted 53 years of residency and warned about long construction timelines and emergency access blocks.
Design Review Board - May 28, 2026 · 2:20:36 →Discussed historical ambulance access problems and severe neighborhood parking shortages.
Design Review Board - May 28, 2026 · 2:25:22 →Raised concerns about neighbor property intrusion during construction and requested independent geological review.
Design Review Board - May 28, 2026 · 2:25:49 →Inquired about Section 8 housing vouchers, housing extensions, and funding allocations.
City Council - May 12, 2026 · 1:23:17 →Expressed support for efforts to address Section 8 housing voucher terminations.
Regular City Council - Apr 21, 2026 · 1:27:49 →Addressed housing voucher policies and urged council action to protect vulnerable tenants.
Regular City Council - Apr 21, 2026 · 2:57:11 →Shared historical experience with TDR projects in Los Angeles but cautioned that the staff report was vague and primarily benefited developers.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:13:00 →Expressed support on behalf of the Montrose Shopping Park Association for transferring development potential away from shopping park parking lots to preserve parking and community events.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:52:54 →Cautioned against high-density development encroaching on established neighborhoods and urged careful preservation of community character.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:57:00 →Expressed confusion over the scope of the TDR item relative to parking lots and raised concerns about luxury apartment development versus ownership housing.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:00:00 →Criticized the lack of public outreach on the TDR proposal and asked for clarity regarding housing element inventory numbers.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:03:35 →Argued against the city giving up control of its parcels and expressed opposition to increased density and heights.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:03:44 →Questioned the monetization of public parking lots and called for prioritizing open space and exploring alternative development sites like golf courses.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:05:53 →Voiced strong support for the TDR program as a smart tool to increase housing production near transit corridors.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:08:46 →Praised outgoing Community Development Director Bradley Calvert and supported exploring revenue-generating options like TDR that avoid local tax increases.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:11:11 →Advocated for urban infill housing, supported the Central Avenue project, and discussed transit improvements and bus shelters.
City Council - Jan 27, 2026 · 4:08:41 →Expressed concern over light pollution from digital signs and supported large-scale housing to address shortages.
City Council - Jan 27, 2026 · 4:06:38 →News & external sources (8)
Arizona’s education-to-workforce link
Arizona has built an extensive education-to-workforce ecosystem. And while it may be full of players, there’s no shared framework for how they fit together. It’s not the only state to
Camelot returns west with luxury community
Camelot Homes is returning to the West Valley with a 19-home luxury development in north Peoria, marking the Scottsdale-based builder’s first new community in the region in about two decades.
Father, doctor launches Big Air Glendale
Dr. Kaleem Aslam wears many hats as a doctor, father and, most recently, an entrepreneur and franchise owner of Big Air Glendale — an indoor trampoline and adventure park. Inspired by his two young sons and Ari...
The Hillburn begins leasing near TSMC
Mark-Taylor Residential recently opened the gates to its new multifamily residential community, The Hillburn — with 283 rental homes, situated near major semiconductor supplier TSMC Arizona. For Managing Director Tarah Garcia, the surrounding area adds to the appeal of the community.
Glendale wins economic award
The city of Glendale was recently honored by the Arizona Association for Economic Development as the 2026 Economic Development Organization of the Year. For Economic Development Deputy Director Lori German, the award reflects the massive momentum and success the city is experiencing.
Glendale City Council rejects Sears redevelopment at 236 N. Central Ave.
Glendale City Council rejects Sears redevelopment at 236 N. Central Ave. Urbanize LA
City of Glendale: Support for New Business Bolstered by Streamlining
City of Glendale: Support for New Business Bolstered by Streamlining Shopping Center Business
Why a California city is trying to build the state's last fossil-fueled power plant
Why a California city is trying to build the state's last fossil-fueled power plant CNBC