Consideration of a Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Program
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) Program Study→At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Feb 24, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Expressed support on behalf of the Montrose Shopping Park Association for transferring development potential away from shopping park parking lots to preserve parking and community events.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:52:54 →Cautioned against high-density development encroaching on established neighborhoods and urged careful preservation of community character.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 1:57:00 →Expressed confusion over the scope of the TDR item relative to parking lots and raised concerns about luxury apartment development versus ownership housing.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:00:00 →Criticized the lack of public outreach on the TDR proposal and asked for clarity regarding housing element inventory numbers.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:03:35 →Argued against the city giving up control of its parcels and expressed opposition to increased density and heights.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:03:44 →Questioned the monetization of public parking lots and called for prioritizing open space and exploring alternative development sites like golf courses.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:05:53 →Voiced strong support for the TDR program as a smart tool to increase housing production near transit corridors.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:08:46 →Praised outgoing Community Development Director Bradley Calvert and supported exploring revenue-generating options like TDR that avoid local tax increases.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:11:11 →Shared historical experience with TDR projects in Los Angeles but cautioned that the staff report was vague and primarily benefited developers.
City Council - Feb 24, 2026 · 2:13:00 →