3411 E. Chevy Chase Drive Setback Variance
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 10
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Apr 15, 2026.
Public comments (10)
Urged the commission to uphold the hearing officer's decision, noting ongoing hardscape modifications since the initial hearing.
Planning Commission - Apr 15, 2026 · 58:11 →President of the Chevy Chase Estates Association spoke against the wall, calling it a textbook example of non-compliance that dwarfs neighboring homes.
Planning Commission - Apr 15, 2026 · 58:24 →Expressed concern that granting a variance would encourage others to build first and ask for forgiveness later.
Planning Commission - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:01:12 →Longtime canyon resident supported the denial, stating it is time to say enough is enough with illegal construction.
Planning Commission - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:03:43 →Questioned whether a variance would ever have been issued initially and raised liability concerns regarding the uninspected wall.
Planning Commission - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:05:07 →Stated the monstrous white wall sticks out and warned against opening the floodgates to illegal building.
Planning Commission - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:05:15 →Stated residents should follow the rules and asked the commission to respect the prior hearing decision.
Planning Commission - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:06:49 →Real estate broker and Chevy Chase Estates Association board member noted the buyers purchased the home with full knowledge of the code violation.
Planning Commission - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:08:04 →Described how the wall was built incrementally over time and asked the commission to uphold the findings.
Planning Commission - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:10:36 →Daily canyon walker who urged upholding the decision, criticizing the wall's height and dismissing arguments about the oak tree as a red herring.
Planning Commission - Apr 15, 2026 · 1:14:52 →