Riverbend Sand and Gravel Permit Appeal
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 2, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Spoke in favor of the mining project appeal as a local engineer and neighbor, emphasizing the critical need for local construction aggregates.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 1:12:54 →Opposed the mining project, citing negative impacts on local wells, water tables, air quality, agriculture, and community health.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 1:15:14 →Expressed frustration with dust, noise, and traffic issues from nearby mining operations and spoke against extending the permit.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 1:17:40 →Represented Kings River Land Trust and urged the board to deny the appeal, citing outdated environmental impact reports and declining water tables.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 1:20:32 →Voiced concerns about the long-term environmental and community impacts of a 75-year mining plan on future generations.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 1:23:03 →Spoke as president of Kings River Conservancy, asking the board to deny the extension or require a brand new environmental impact report.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 1:25:14 →Explained that his property is surrounded by the project site, argued that minimal spending over 10 years does not constitute substantial development, and noted outdated EIR information.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 1:29:01 →Expressed concern that neighbors did not receive proper notifications and highlighted local wildlife and infrastructure stress.
Board of Supervisors — June 2, 2026 · 1:32:25 →