Parkside FV Residential Development Proposal
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 25, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Expressed strong opposition to the apartment project, citing severe morning and evening traffic congestion on Warner Avenue and incompatibility with the single-family neighborhood.
Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 1:51:05 →Expressed concerns about site constraints, parking spillover, and safety risks near the nearby elementary school.
Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 1:57:45 →Spoke in support of the zoning change and project, noting that commercial real estate demand has dropped and private property owners should be allowed to build needed housing.
Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 2:00:40 →Criticized traffic signal delays along Warner Avenue and questioned the accuracy of the traffic counts, while noting high-density projects create congestion.
Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 2:03:15 →Stated that the owner created a neglected property and should not expect the city to bail them out, raising concerns about cumulative traffic with the nearby Boomers project.
Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 2:06:42 →Raised concerns about political influences, traffic safety, and the potential negative impact on the neighboring Warner Avenue Veterinary clinic used by generations of residents.
Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 2:09:33 →Expressed deep concern over severe parking shortages (96 residential spaces for 72 units) and urged the commission to consider townhomes instead of apartments.
Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 2:12:38 →