California Record
Fountain Valley
Development

Parkside FV Residential Development Proposal

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (5)Concerned (1)

At a glance

Public comments
7
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 25, 2026.

Public comments (7)

OpposedVal FoxMar 25, 2026

Expressed strong opposition to the apartment project, citing severe morning and evening traffic congestion on Warner Avenue and incompatibility with the single-family neighborhood.

Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 1:51:05 →
ConcernedLarry HadleyMar 25, 2026

Expressed concerns about site constraints, parking spillover, and safety risks near the nearby elementary school.

Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 1:57:45 →
SupportivePerry ClitherowMar 25, 2026

Spoke in support of the zoning change and project, noting that commercial real estate demand has dropped and private property owners should be allowed to build needed housing.

Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 2:00:40 →
OpposedRick CarusoMar 25, 2026

Criticized traffic signal delays along Warner Avenue and questioned the accuracy of the traffic counts, while noting high-density projects create congestion.

Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 2:03:15 →
OpposedPat NealMar 25, 2026

Stated that the owner created a neglected property and should not expect the city to bail them out, raising concerns about cumulative traffic with the nearby Boomers project.

Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 2:06:42 →
OpposedKatie WrightMar 25, 2026

Raised concerns about political influences, traffic safety, and the potential negative impact on the neighboring Warner Avenue Veterinary clinic used by generations of residents.

Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 2:09:33 →
OpposedRichard SMar 25, 2026

Expressed deep concern over severe parking shortages (96 residential spaces for 72 units) and urged the commission to consider townhomes instead of apartments.

Planning Commission - Mar 25, 2026 · 2:12:38 →