California Record
Fontana, California
Zoning

Senior care facility on Maloof Avenue

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Opposed (8)

At a glance

Public comments
8
Last 30 days
8

Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Nov 3, 2026.

Public comments (8)

OpposedLetricia AlmeidaNov 3, 2026

Lives behind the site; called the project a horrible idea, citing 40-plus residents with few nurses, no sidewalks, kids on the street, traffic, noise, and only 13 parking spaces. Urged denial.

Planning Commission — November 3, 2026 · 24:38 →
OpposedDelia SavedoNov 3, 2026

Neighbor with small kids; cited existing school traffic, no sidewalks or sewage, a prior denial of a five-home proposal, and feared noise complaints against family gatherings. Wanted it built elsewhere.

Planning Commission — November 3, 2026 · 28:13 →
OpposedArt (last name not stated)Nov 3, 2026

Lives directly across the street, 16 years; called 13 spots for 24 beds ridiculous, worried about emergency vehicles, deaths at the facility, and said the building looks commercial in a family neighborhood.

Planning Commission — November 3, 2026 · 31:31 →
OpposedRoxy (last name not stated)Nov 3, 2026

Opposed the facility citing parking constraints, traffic and safety concerns, property value impacts, and said the building looks commercial; noted a prior owner's home plan was denied.

Planning Commission — November 3, 2026 · 35:30 →
OpposedUnidentified Resident (wife of 'Josh')Nov 3, 2026

Lives next door to the site; opposed over parking, safety, ambulance and police activity, and said vacant commercial lots elsewhere in Fontana are better locations.

Planning Commission — November 3, 2026 · 40:33 →
OpposedGaby PérezNov 3, 2026

Speaking in Spanish, living next to the site; stressed child safety, strangers parking near playing children, ambulances, noise conflicts, and asked that the business find a more suitable location.

Planning Commission — November 3, 2026 · 41:59 →
OpposedJosh (last name not stated)Nov 3, 2026

Lives next to the proposed site; opposed over no sidewalks, inadequate parking, kids walking to school, and predicted conflicts between parties/holidays and elderly residents' complaints.

Planning Commission — November 3, 2026 · 45:00 →
OpposedLuis LuceñoNov 3, 2026

Said the block is residential, not for profit; argued the facility is about profit not helping the elderly, needs far more than 13 spaces, and asked commissioners to have the project moved elsewhere.

Planning Commission — November 3, 2026 · 45:39 →