California Record
Encinitas
Roads

Santa Fe Drive Redesign and Parking Configuration

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (6)Opposed (7)Concerned (1)Neutral (1)

At a glance

Public comments
16
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Jun 24, 2026.

Public comments (16)

SupportiveMolly HantlianJun 24, 2026

Supported addressing the current street design flaws, noting that the 11-inch curb and narrow lane widths for back-in parking create safety hazards and ADA access issues.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 23:07 →
SupportiveSteve DickinsonJun 24, 2026

Expressed appreciation for the enhanced crosswalk and westbound bike lane, while cautioning against using loose stones in landscaped areas near pedestrian paths.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 25:30 →
SupportiveSteve LinkeJun 24, 2026

Highlighted crash hazards associated with physical barriers in separated bikeways and recommended buffered Class II bike lanes, warning signage improvements, and option 3.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 26:29 →
SupportiveEd SpragueJun 24, 2026

Supported option 3 to ensure emergency vehicle access and alleviate congestion on Santa Fe Drive.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 31:30 →
OpposedJudy BurelfineJun 24, 2026

Strongly opposed the redesign, arguing it prioritizes driver convenience over cyclist safety and disproportionately impacts female cyclists.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 31:16 →
MixedImogene BissettJun 24, 2026

Shared local observations as a resident across from the high school, noting that while back-in parking is unpopular, ripping out recently installed infrastructure is a waste of money.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 31:16 →
OpposedDaba PonzelJun 24, 2026

Used kinetic energy physics examples to compare collisions between pedestrians and e-bikes versus cars, arguing that removing separated protections increases danger.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 42:30 →
NeutralChris GilesJun 24, 2026

Suggested that if the project moves forward, Option 3 is best, but advocated for lowering speed limits across Santa Fe Drive to 25 mph.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 47:31 →
ConcernedNiels LundJun 24, 2026

Praised engineering staff but suggested creating a fourth design option maintaining protected bike lanes on both sides.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 50:07 →
OpposedCasey GuptaJun 24, 2026

A high school student and new driver who urged the council to keep protected bike lanes, emphasizing that the street must remain safe for student cyclists.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 51:31 →
OpposedEugenia PimentelJun 24, 2026

Strongly condemned the redesign as prioritizing driver convenience and fossil fuel dependence over safety and climate resilience.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 54:03 →
OpposedQuincy BumpJun 24, 2026

Speaking for the San Diego County Bicycle Coalition, argued that replacing separated bikeways with painted Class II lanes increases collision risks.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 51:11 →
SupportiveSandra EdwardsJun 24, 2026

A long-time resident living near Santa Fe Drive who supported the current improvements, noting they have slowed traffic and reduced accidents.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 59:30 →
OpposedTotoJun 24, 2026

Expressed skepticism about government planning, referencing broader urban design concepts and bike accidents on Coast Highway.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 1:02:45 →
SupportivePatty StottlemyreJun 24, 2026

A former emergency room nurse who supported the redo to ensure proper traffic flow and emergency vehicle access.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 59:19 →
OpposedKaren FreemanJun 24, 2026

Shared her survival of a severe bicycle accident and stressed the critical importance of raised bike lanes for cyclist safety.

City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 1:09:00 →