Santa Fe Drive Redesign and Parking Configuration
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 16
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 24, 2026.
Public comments (16)
Supported addressing the current street design flaws, noting that the 11-inch curb and narrow lane widths for back-in parking create safety hazards and ADA access issues.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 23:07 →Expressed appreciation for the enhanced crosswalk and westbound bike lane, while cautioning against using loose stones in landscaped areas near pedestrian paths.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 25:30 →Highlighted crash hazards associated with physical barriers in separated bikeways and recommended buffered Class II bike lanes, warning signage improvements, and option 3.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 26:29 →Supported option 3 to ensure emergency vehicle access and alleviate congestion on Santa Fe Drive.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 31:30 →Strongly opposed the redesign, arguing it prioritizes driver convenience over cyclist safety and disproportionately impacts female cyclists.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 31:16 →Shared local observations as a resident across from the high school, noting that while back-in parking is unpopular, ripping out recently installed infrastructure is a waste of money.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 31:16 →Used kinetic energy physics examples to compare collisions between pedestrians and e-bikes versus cars, arguing that removing separated protections increases danger.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 42:30 →Suggested that if the project moves forward, Option 3 is best, but advocated for lowering speed limits across Santa Fe Drive to 25 mph.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 47:31 →Praised engineering staff but suggested creating a fourth design option maintaining protected bike lanes on both sides.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 50:07 →A high school student and new driver who urged the council to keep protected bike lanes, emphasizing that the street must remain safe for student cyclists.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 51:31 →Strongly condemned the redesign as prioritizing driver convenience and fossil fuel dependence over safety and climate resilience.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 54:03 →Speaking for the San Diego County Bicycle Coalition, argued that replacing separated bikeways with painted Class II lanes increases collision risks.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 51:11 →A long-time resident living near Santa Fe Drive who supported the current improvements, noting they have slowed traffic and reduced accidents.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 59:30 →Expressed skepticism about government planning, referencing broader urban design concepts and bike accidents on Coast Highway.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 1:02:45 →A former emergency room nurse who supported the redo to ensure proper traffic flow and emergency vehicle access.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 59:19 →Shared her survival of a severe bicycle accident and stressed the critical importance of raised bike lanes for cyclist safety.
City Council (Special) - Jun 24, 2026 · 1:09:00 →