Zoning
Cannabis setbacks
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Supportive (2)Opposed (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 3
- Last 30 days
- 3
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 20, 2026.
Public comments (3)
SupportiveTodd MooreOct 20, 2026
Supported the amendment, saying the setback-reduction exception had swallowed the rule and functioned as a bait and switch.
Board of Supervisors — October 20, 2026 · 5:37:48 →OpposedNatalie PriceOct 20, 2026
Urged a no vote on Alternative A, citing Resolution 142-2026 and county data showing most applicants sought setback relief; asked for removal of reductions for every use.
Board of Supervisors — October 20, 2026 · 5:35:01 →SupportiveCammy MorialiOct 20, 2026
Supported the amendment only insofar as it closes the loophole, noting 800 feet isn't enough — you'd see, hear, and smell a grow from that distance.
Board of Supervisors — October 20, 2026 · 5:43:18 →