High PriorityDevelopmentopen

Inclusionary Housing Ordinance Review and Temporary Incentive Program

Summary

East Palo Alto's inclusionary housing rules require 20% affordable units at deep affordability levels — the costliest in San Mateo County — but have produced only two units since 2019. The council is weighing a temporary reduction (THDIP) to spur construction while awaiting a countywide feasibility study. Supporters say the current rules block all housing; opponents say loosening them shortchanges low-income residents.

At a glance

Total mentions
1
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 24, 2026.

Impact analysis

💰Financial impact

Could affect affordable unit counts in future developments and city fee revenue; San Jose's similar program cost about $20 million in foregone revenue for five projects.

✅Who benefits

Developers and small property owners who'd find projects financially feasible, plus future residents if housing actually gets built.

⚠️Who could be affected

Low-income residents could see fewer deeply affordable units if requirements are reduced without replacement mechanisms.

Mentions & discussions (1)

We'll email you when it's on an upcoming agenda and when it's voted on, at most once a day.

The weekly brief for East Palo Alto

What the council decided, in plain English — one email a week.

Also follow nearby cities

Free. Unsubscribe with one click any time. We never sell your email.