Woodland Park amendment

Said Sand Hill always seeks concessions and urged the council to make its own deal enforcing the inclusionary ordinance, not rubber-stamp the negotiated package.

Urged rejection of the concessions, saying weakening an approved development agreement rewards delay and sets a bad precedent; questioned whether right-of-return households could access Ravenswood units.

Supported moving forward, favoring the school district option as a benefit to education and housing goals.

Former resident urged approval, warning that missing the opportunity defaults on obligations to waiting families; also asked for earlier meeting times.