Temporary Housing Incentive Program
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jul 7, 2026.
Public comments (9)
Began commenting on the consent calendar but was redirected; she urged the council to vote against the temporary housing incentive ordinance, warning rising rents will empty Tongan churches and erase Pacific Islander culture.
City Council - Jul 7, 2026 · 7:39 →Opposed the temporary program, saying the 35% AMI commitment was where the city was headed and that 'nothing is temporary' about weakening protections.
City Council - Jul 7, 2026 · 2:24:03 →Spoke in Spanish against weakening the inclusionary ordinance, saying the community fought for these protections and every 5% reduction means losing affordable opportunities.
City Council - Jul 7, 2026 · 2:26:22 →Consultant for the 1201 Runnymede townhome project asked the council to set the small-project exemption at 20 units instead of 10, which would unlock 34 entitled townhomes.
City Council - Jul 7, 2026 · 2:36:30 →Former councilmember urged waiting for the nexus study, calling the proposed 7-8% requirements 'outrageous' and a step toward making EPA a bedroom community for Palo Alto.
City Council - Jul 7, 2026 · 2:34:48 →Former mayor urged denial of the THDIP, saying inclusionary housing let him raise his family here and that EPA shouldn't be compared to Redwood City.
City Council - Jul 7, 2026 · 2:45:51 →Warned the program would add 2,000 higher-income units, shifting the voting majority and decimating political power of working-class people of color.
City Council - Jul 7, 2026 · 3:20:35 →Born-and-raised resident urged the council to wait for the next study, accusing members of selling out residents to developers.
City Council - Jul 7, 2026 · 3:18:01 →Long-time resident credited below-market-rate programs with keeping her in the community for 25 years and asked the council to wait for the study.
City Council - Jul 7, 2026 · 3:23:04 →