Development

Four Corners appeal

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (8)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
10
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 3, 2026.

Public comments (15)

SupportiveDeborah Lewis VirgisMar 3, 2026

A former skeptic who now supports the project, urging approval 'because it's the right thing to do' and noting the townhomes could help renters become homeowners.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:28:31 →
OpposedMichael MayshackMar 3, 2026

Opposed, citing townhome affordability requiring $147,000 income and asking why only 5,000 sq ft of retail when retail was a major city campaign promise.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:30:29 →
OpposedAdrian AvilaMar 3, 2026

Sheet metal workers union rep said Sand Hill has no viable plan for local apprenticeships and community workforce benefits promised in the specific plan.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:33:04 →
MixedStuart HighlandMar 3, 2026

Echoed union concerns and asked about income targeting, tree buffers, and affordability levels, saying he's not necessarily supportive.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:35:04 →
SupportiveKevin DohertyMar 3, 2026

Urged approval: housing solves societal problems, the empty lot yields no taxes, schools need money after Facebook's departure, and jobs matter for youth.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:36:41 →
SupportiveOscar ArtetaMar 3, 2026

Read translated comments from four neighbors supporting the project, including one warning 'we will see you at the polls' if it stalls again.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:38:48 →
SupportiveMarioMar 3, 2026

Spoke in Spanish and English urging approval, saying opponents already have their affordable buildings and the city needs the jobs and taxes.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:41:24 →
SupportiveLeticia MartinezMar 3, 2026

A head of household asking for approval so her family can become first-time buyers in East Palo Alto.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:47:06 →
OpposedLavaine HendersonMar 3, 2026

Asked why the city should trust Sand Hill when maintenance at their existing buildings, including where his father lives, is horrible.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:49:27 →
OpposedPhillyMar 3, 2026

Said the affordable amount violates the inclusionary housing policy and the city needs housing residents can afford, citing 4,000 applicants to Colibri Commons.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:50:26 →
SupportiveIsabel Lopez IsmailMar 3, 2026

Supported both projects, citing the developer's responsiveness, the regional housing obligation, the city's structural deficit, and the cost of losing a lawsuit.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:51:36 →
SupportiveJeff PageMar 3, 2026

Ravenswood Choice representative urged approval, citing engagement, connection fees addressing infrastructure gaps, and the requirements of law.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:52:24 →
SupportiveRobert ColemanMar 3, 2026

A former resident who praised Sand Hill's outreach as exemplary and urged the council not to let the project be threatened.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:54:08 →
MixedDaniel SotoMar 3, 2026

A lifelong resident and business owner who's neutral on the project but says the rezoning has squeezed out local businesses in favor of wealthy investors.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:56:00 →
MixedAdrian BryantMar 3, 2026

Asked the developer to restore setbacks between the mixed-use and townhome portions and to consider more commercial space.

City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:58:10 →