Four Corners appeal
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 10
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 3, 2026.
Public comments (15)
A former skeptic who now supports the project, urging approval 'because it's the right thing to do' and noting the townhomes could help renters become homeowners.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:28:31 →Opposed, citing townhome affordability requiring $147,000 income and asking why only 5,000 sq ft of retail when retail was a major city campaign promise.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:30:29 →Sheet metal workers union rep said Sand Hill has no viable plan for local apprenticeships and community workforce benefits promised in the specific plan.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:33:04 →Echoed union concerns and asked about income targeting, tree buffers, and affordability levels, saying he's not necessarily supportive.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:35:04 →Urged approval: housing solves societal problems, the empty lot yields no taxes, schools need money after Facebook's departure, and jobs matter for youth.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:36:41 →Read translated comments from four neighbors supporting the project, including one warning 'we will see you at the polls' if it stalls again.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:38:48 →Spoke in Spanish and English urging approval, saying opponents already have their affordable buildings and the city needs the jobs and taxes.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:41:24 →A head of household asking for approval so her family can become first-time buyers in East Palo Alto.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:47:06 →Asked why the city should trust Sand Hill when maintenance at their existing buildings, including where his father lives, is horrible.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:49:27 →Said the affordable amount violates the inclusionary housing policy and the city needs housing residents can afford, citing 4,000 applicants to Colibri Commons.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:50:26 →Supported both projects, citing the developer's responsiveness, the regional housing obligation, the city's structural deficit, and the cost of losing a lawsuit.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:51:36 →Ravenswood Choice representative urged approval, citing engagement, connection fees addressing infrastructure gaps, and the requirements of law.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:52:24 →A former resident who praised Sand Hill's outreach as exemplary and urged the council not to let the project be threatened.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:54:08 →A lifelong resident and business owner who's neutral on the project but says the rezoning has squeezed out local businesses in favor of wealthy investors.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:56:00 →Asked the developer to restore setbacks between the mixed-use and townhome portions and to consider more commercial space.
City Council - Mar 3, 2026 · 1:58:10 →