Los Alamitos Race Course redevelopment
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Los Alamitos Race Course Specific Plan 3.0 Buildout→At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 25, 2026.
Public comments (12)
Argued the developed Costco/apartment parcels shouldn't be treated as future redevelopment, that no city financial commitments are identified in the EIR, and that park-access objections are minor since everything is within three-eighths of a mile of Cerritos Avenue.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 22:08 →Opposed converting parkland to stormwater detention, supported interconnected park greenways, and asked the city to publish data about its Flock license plate reader cameras and drone use.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 25:32 →A former council member who questioned where the Measure A town center went, whether the floating park acre is consistent with the specific plan, and traffic mitigation for 2,000 homes; asked the council to take the issue back to the community.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 37:45 →Questioned why, after eight years of planning, key questions remain unanswered — the vanished town center, unlocated floating park acre, traffic circle feasibility, and recusal disparities among council members.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 49:15 →Supported responsible redevelopment but asked that public streets and parks not become HOA maintenance burdens, urged expanding the commons beyond one acre, supported a pedestrian connection to Lexington Park, and called for an ad hoc resident planning committee.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 52:32 →Called claims that the commons vanished inaccurate rhetoric, acknowledged a real reduction but said the planned commons plus 18 acres of citywide parks is real and sizable; urged certification.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:29:59 →Warned that delay risks the racetrack being sold off in pieces, said there's no net park loss, and called the project a once-in-a-generation chance for responsible growth meeting state housing mandates.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:31:10 →A former council member who defended the staff process, explained the one-acre Lexington Park dedication has always been planned, and urged certification of the EIR so negotiations on the development agreement can continue.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:33:02 →Advocated for EIR Alternative 3, which would preserve the historic grandstand as a 4,700-seat venue while providing 4,400 homes — just 391 fewer than the project — arguing demolition is permanent and asking why the irreversible decision must be made tonight.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:36:03 →Supported certifying the EIR, noting voters already weighed in via Measure S and that the alternative would pack housing onto Lincoln Avenue; also urged follow-up on the brown water issue.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:39:05 →A resident and business owner worried the racetrack's demolition erases Cypress's culture and history; asked whether the historic building can be preserved or creatively repurposed rather than replaced with houses.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:41:13 →A 21-year-old Cypress native who said he can't imagine affording a home here, and urged the council to approve the EIR so young people and working families get a shot at staying in the city.
City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:47:30 →