California Record
Cypress
Development

Los Alamitos Race Course redevelopment

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (5)Opposed (2)

At a glance

Public comments
8
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Aug 25, 2026.

Public comments (12)

SupportiveGlenn ButtonAug 25, 2026

Argued the developed Costco/apartment parcels shouldn't be treated as future redevelopment, that no city financial commitments are identified in the EIR, and that park-access objections are minor since everything is within three-eighths of a mile of Cerritos Avenue.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 22:08 →
OpposedEd KramerAug 25, 2026

Opposed converting parkland to stormwater detention, supported interconnected park greenways, and asked the city to publish data about its Flock license plate reader cameras and drone use.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 25:32 →
OpposedFrancis MarquezAug 25, 2026

A former council member who questioned where the Measure A town center went, whether the floating park acre is consistent with the specific plan, and traffic mitigation for 2,000 homes; asked the council to take the issue back to the community.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 37:45 →
OpposedTom MooreAug 25, 2026

Questioned why, after eight years of planning, key questions remain unanswered — the vanished town center, unlocated floating park acre, traffic circle feasibility, and recusal disparities among council members.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 49:15 →
MixedHelen LeeAug 25, 2026

Supported responsible redevelopment but asked that public streets and parks not become HOA maintenance burdens, urged expanding the commons beyond one acre, supported a pedestrian connection to Lexington Park, and called for an ad hoc resident planning committee.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 52:32 →
SupportiveJoy HarperAug 25, 2026

Called claims that the commons vanished inaccurate rhetoric, acknowledged a real reduction but said the planned commons plus 18 acres of citywide parks is real and sizable; urged certification.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:29:59 →
SupportiveColin EdwardsAug 25, 2026

Warned that delay risks the racetrack being sold off in pieces, said there's no net park loss, and called the project a once-in-a-generation chance for responsible growth meeting state housing mandates.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:31:10 →
SupportivePaula MoralesAug 25, 2026

A former council member who defended the staff process, explained the one-acre Lexington Park dedication has always been planned, and urged certification of the EIR so negotiations on the development agreement can continue.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:33:02 →
OpposedTom NakalaAug 25, 2026

Advocated for EIR Alternative 3, which would preserve the historic grandstand as a 4,700-seat venue while providing 4,400 homes — just 391 fewer than the project — arguing demolition is permanent and asking why the irreversible decision must be made tonight.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:36:03 →
SupportiveLeanne OsendasAug 25, 2026

Supported certifying the EIR, noting voters already weighed in via Measure S and that the alternative would pack housing onto Lincoln Avenue; also urged follow-up on the brown water issue.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:39:05 →
OpposedMarcella DensichlessAug 25, 2026

A resident and business owner worried the racetrack's demolition erases Cypress's culture and history; asked whether the historic building can be preserved or creatively repurposed rather than replaced with houses.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:41:13 →
SupportiveZachary HarperAug 25, 2026

A 21-year-old Cypress native who said he can't imagine affording a home here, and urged the council to approve the EIR so young people and working families get a shot at staying in the city.

City Council Regular — August 25, 2026 · 1:47:30 →