Stevens Creek Townhome Developments and Neighborhood Compatibility
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 9
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jan 21, 2026.
Public comments (9)
A Wheaton Drive homeowner asked the council to demand a better rear setback from Dividend Homes, comparing it unfavorably to the Staples project compromise.
City Council — January 21, 2026 · 1:55:55 →Asked the council to increase the rear setback to 20 feet and require a row of screen trees every 15 feet along the property line.
City Council — January 21, 2026 · 1:59:17 →Owner of Bright Stars Pediatric Speech Therapy on Stevens Creek explained that she invested $170,000 during the pandemic and $100,000 recently in custom tenant improvements, only to find out her building will be torn down.
City Council — January 21, 2026 · 2:02:01 →Expressed general support for housing but argued that violating heart-of-the-city setback guidelines is unfair to existing neighbors.
City Council — January 21, 2026 · 2:05:01 →Highlighted severe rear setback discrepancies and suggested site plan modifications to improve backyard separation.
City Council — January 21, 2026 · 2:06:36 →Raised concerns regarding severe traffic congestion, school safety, and parking impacts around the Blaney Avenue and Stevens Creek corridor.
City Council — January 21, 2026 · 2:09:55 →Supported new housing development, stating Cupertino needs more fair and affordable housing for the future.
City Council — January 21, 2026 · 2:16:30 →Criticized state housing policies for tying local hands and asked whether bird-safe and dark sky ordinances apply to these projects.
City Council — January 21, 2026 · 2:17:17 →Planning Commission Chair spoke in favor of the project, emphasizing the need to welcome new families who will value the homes.
City Council — January 21, 2026 · 3:08:25 →