California Record
Cupertino
Zoning

High-Density Townhome Development and Wildfire Safety on Linda Vista Drive

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (2)Opposed (10)Concerned (5)

At a glance

Public comments
17
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 24, 2026.

Public comments (17)

OpposedDavid YanFeb 24, 2026

Argued that the Linda Vista townhome project violates fire code aerial access requirements and setback rules.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:01:09 →
OpposedDuchang CaoFeb 24, 2026

Presented a traffic and wildfire evacuation model showing severe bottlenecks and gridlock on Linda Vista Drive during an emergency.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:04:00 →
ConcernedHenry SangFeb 24, 2026

Expressed concerns about high fuel loads along Stevens Creek Trail and requested enhanced wildfire resilience measures for the development.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:09:41 →
ConcernedAl SpencerFeb 24, 2026

Suggested including three-bedroom single-story homes and addressing children's recreation and guest parking.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:13:03 →
OpposedPatrick SwemiFeb 24, 2026

Shared personal experience from the Park Fire in Chico, arguing that high-density developments in fire zones remain highly vulnerable.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:13:49 →
OpposedKeith KraftFeb 24, 2026

Objected to placing a high-density multi-unit complex in a single-family residential zone, citing land-use compatibility principles.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:17:03 →
ConcernedJennifer GriffinFeb 24, 2026

Expressed worry over evacuation routes and wildfire risks, referencing recent fires in Los Altos and the Palisades.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:20:03 →
OpposedPKFeb 24, 2026

Raised concerns about three-story buildings encroaching on privacy and requested reduced height and increased setbacks.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:23:04 →
OpposedMark FantozziFeb 24, 2026

Detailed multiple conflicts with municipal code standards regarding height, setbacks, FAR ratio, open space, and lack of evacuation analysis.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:24:41 →
ConcernedCraig CummingsFeb 24, 2026

Highlighted past neighborhood fires and urged the commission to thoroughly review safety concerns before proceeding.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:32:19 →
OpposedSrinivas RagdvendraFeb 24, 2026

Stressed the extreme danger of high-density housing in high fire hazard zones and urged commissioners to push back against state mandates.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:34:02 →
OpposedRhoda FryeFeb 24, 2026

Questioned the validity of the CEQA exemption for a project located in a very high fire hazard zone.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:37:05 →
SupportiveConnie CunninghamFeb 24, 2026

Voiced support for the townhome development as an infill project providing much-needed for-sale affordable housing near schools.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:40:20 →
OpposedLynn YFeb 24, 2026

Criticized the lack of neighborhood notification during the zoning change process and raised traffic and congestion concerns.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:42:24 →
ConcernedLisa WarrenFeb 24, 2026

Expressed sympathy for neighbors dealing with state housing laws and questioned the long-term maintenance of setback landscaping.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:46:01 →
OpposedNicholas CaoFeb 24, 2026

Questioned the numerous density bonus waivers and whether the project fits the neighborhood scale.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:49:00 →
SupportiveLewis MoranteFeb 24, 2026

Expressed strong support on behalf of the Bay Area Council for the townhome project as a vital starter-home opportunity.

Planning Commission — February 24, 2026 · 2:50:26 →