Parks Rec
Blesch Property Optimal Use
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Supportive (1)Opposed (1)Neutral (2)
Related issue
Blesch Property Optimal Use and Park Conversion→At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 17, 2026.
Public comments (5)
NeutralJennifer GriffinMar 17, 2026
Suggested exploring parking or temporary secure storage for the Blesch property and noted nearby historic survey markers.
City Council — March 17, 2026 · 2:50:14 →NeutralClaudio BonoMar 17, 2026
Spoke as Vice President of the Cupertino Historical Society, noting a lack of prior discussion regarding the historic site and requesting community engagement.
City Council — March 17, 2026 · 2:53:36 →SupportiveRododa FryeMar 17, 2026
Advocated tearing down the structure on the Blesch property, returning it to nature, and avoiding historical society management.
City Council — March 17, 2026 · 2:58:21 →MixedDanessa TekmanskiMar 17, 2026
Supported clearing the Blesch property structure and utilizing it for unimproved trail parking or leaving it as open space.
City Council — March 17, 2026 · 2:58:08 →OpposedSan RaoMar 17, 2026
Opposed adding parking or bus stops at the Blesch property due to traffic safety hazards and urged against hiring consultants.
City Council — March 17, 2026 · 2:59:32 →