Development

Uplander Way appeal

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)Opposed (1)

At a glance

Public comments
5
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Feb 9, 2026.

Public comments (5)

SupportiveJudy ShermanFeb 9, 2026

Fox Hills resident thanked SAFER for the appeal, called the city's treatment of Fox Hills hypocritical given nearly 3,000 planned units, and predicted she'd be 'pleasantly surprised' if the appeal was granted.

City Council Meeting Agenda — February 9, 2026 · 3:39:13 →
SupportiveAlan LuluFeb 9, 2026

Longtime 'build, build, build' advocate pleaded with the council to reject the appeal and approve housing everywhere in the city, including his own Sunkiss Park neighborhood.

City Council Meeting Agenda — February 9, 2026 · 3:41:32 →
OpposedTom O'NeillFeb 9, 2026

Criticized state-mandated high-density development as a 'scam' and said California's homeownership dream is 'on life support.'

City Council Meeting Agenda — February 9, 2026 · 3:43:04 →
SupportiveEric ShapsisFeb 9, 2026

Speaking for the applicant, noted Chamber of Commerce and Planning Commission support and itemized $7.99M in park fees and $3.5M in mobility fees.

City Council Meeting Agenda — February 9, 2026 · 3:45:07 →
SupportiveJacob PierceFeb 9, 2026

Abundant Housing LA policy associate shared his sister's displacement from Fox Hills and warned denial would violate the Housing Accountability Act.

City Council Meeting Agenda — February 9, 2026 · 2:56:15 →