Delivery robot pilot
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Delivery robot pilot program→At a glance
- Public comments
- 8
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 10, 2026.
Public comments (8)
Pitched the robots as cutting emissions 16% and easing parking congestion, and cautioned against heavy advertising fees based on West Hollywood's experience.
City Council Meeting Agenda — August 10, 2026 · 3:25:05 →Coco Robotics representative who thanked staff and said his zero-emission bots ease curb congestion versus double-parked delivery cars.
City Council Meeting Agenda — August 10, 2026 · 3:29:32 →Supported the pilot but insisted the city assess an operating license fee on robot companies to cover staff and monitoring costs, based on her experience running another city's program.
City Council Meeting Agenda — August 10, 2026 · 3:33:42 →Spoke for the Downtown Business Association supporting more delivery options, quipping about a Waymo yielding to a Coco robot as a sign of the times.
City Council Meeting Agenda — August 10, 2026 · 22:06 →Called it pro and con — likes the green angle but warned the city must not lose money like the Mooc pilot, and worried about narrow downtown sidewalks.
City Council Meeting Agenda — August 10, 2026 · 3:32:27 →Chamber of Commerce representative urging approval so local restaurants can compete with neighbors' cities that already have robot delivery.
City Council Meeting Agenda — August 10, 2026 · 3:33:38 →A 16-year resident and Serve Robotics field operations supervisor who emphasized the real jobs and people behind the technology.
City Council Meeting Agenda — August 10, 2026 · 3:35:33 →Streets Are for Everyone director (sponsored by Serve) supporting the pilot as congestion relief, while flagging caution about Coco's higher-speed bike-lane robots elsewhere.
City Council Meeting Agenda — August 10, 2026 · 3:37:25 →