Community Workforce Agreement
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Community Workforce Agreement with Building Trades→At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 7
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 13, 2026.
Public comments (7)
A Local 709 second-year apprentice and Culver City resident urged approval, citing local jobs and the local economy.
City Council Meeting Agenda — October 13, 2026 · 1:22:02 →Ironworkers Local 416 president urged a yes vote, citing fair wages and his own 29,732 hours lost to commuting before local hire.
City Council Meeting Agenda — October 13, 2026 · 1:23:15 →LAANE's climate campaign director urged adoption of the workforce agreement, citing research showing such agreements deliver on-time, on-budget projects and local hiring.
City Council Meeting Agenda — October 13, 2026 · 1:13:31 →LA/OC Building Trades representative urged a yes vote, citing local hire language, apprenticeship demographics, and the existing CCUSD agreement.
City Council Meeting Agenda — October 13, 2026 · 1:16:01 →IBEW Local 11 business agent urged approval, citing 1,800 apprentices in training and support for small signatory contractors.
City Council Meeting Agenda — October 13, 2026 · 1:18:01 →Sheet Metal Workers Local 105 representative urged support, emphasizing shorter commutes and local careers.
City Council Meeting Agenda — October 13, 2026 · 1:19:32 →Fire Sprinklers Local 709 rep strongly urged approval, citing apprentices needing on-the-job experience and the CCUSD precedent.
City Council Meeting Agenda — October 13, 2026 · 1:20:29 →