Taxes Budget

C-8 PIP grant use

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (1)Opposed (3)

At a glance

Public comments
4
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 16, 2026.

Public comments (4)

OpposedRonald OstrandMar 16, 2026

A small landlord urged the grant funds go to rental assistance rather than a right-to-counsel program, arguing free legal aid harms housing providers.

City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 44:25 →
OpposedMeg SullivanMar 16, 2026

A landlord who argued the grant should fund rental assistance, not full legal representation, and that right-to-counsel plans bypassed robust public input.

City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 1:00:39 →
SupportiveShane HensonMar 16, 2026

An eviction defense attorney on the housing homelessness committee supported right-to-counsel, citing courtroom observations of unrepresented tenants losing cases.

City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 1:03:34 →
OpposedJeff HornMar 16, 2026

Opposed funding free legal advice, arguing money is best spent helping people stay in housing and that most landlords are honest operators.

City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 1:06:08 →