A-5 Hayden Tract Specific Plan
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Hayden Tract Specific Plan→At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Mar 16, 2026.
Public comments (6)
Warned against unaffordable affordable-housing mandates that yield zero housing, and urged the plan keep Hayden Tract cool with car-free areas, wide sidewalks, and true mixed use.
City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:47:25 →Supported either height option, relayed his father's wish to preserve sky views along the Ballona Creek bike path, and asked that open spaces be publicly accessible.
City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:50:03 →Argued the initial height alternatives are too timid to pencil given land costs, and urged a plan that goes taller to fund open space and mobility amenities.
City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:52:39 →Called the initial proposals a missed opportunity for iconic architecture and urged creative, unique design rather than a 'run of the mill mid-rise.'
City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:11:28 →Urged multiple connections to Ballona Creek, suggested a car-free boulevard, and pointed to Higuera and Ince as potential access points.
City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:14:15 →Suggested form-based zoning for flexibility, praised National Boulevard improvements, and pointed to the Cul-de-Sac Tempe car-free community as a model.
City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:58:27 →