Development

A-5 Hayden Tract Specific Plan

Summary not yet generated for this topic.

Community sentiment

Supportive (4)

At a glance

Public comments
6
Last 30 days
0

Last discussed Mar 16, 2026.

Public comments (6)

MixedJean BlackMar 16, 2026

Warned against unaffordable affordable-housing mandates that yield zero housing, and urged the plan keep Hayden Tract cool with car-free areas, wide sidewalks, and true mixed use.

City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:47:25 →
SupportiveJack GalantiMar 16, 2026

Supported either height option, relayed his father's wish to preserve sky views along the Ballona Creek bike path, and asked that open spaces be publicly accessible.

City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:50:03 →
SupportiveScott EpsteinMar 16, 2026

Argued the initial height alternatives are too timid to pencil given land costs, and urged a plan that goes taller to fund open space and mobility amenities.

City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:52:39 →
MixedJoseph Cohen MayMar 16, 2026

Called the initial proposals a missed opportunity for iconic architecture and urged creative, unique design rather than a 'run of the mill mid-rise.'

City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:11:28 →
SupportiveBen ParnessMar 16, 2026

Urged multiple connections to Ballona Creek, suggested a car-free boulevard, and pointed to Higuera and Ince as potential access points.

City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:14:15 →
SupportiveTravis MorganMar 16, 2026

Suggested form-based zoning for flexibility, praised National Boulevard improvements, and pointed to the Cul-de-Sac Tempe car-free community as a model.

City Council Meeting Agenda — March 16, 2026 · 3:58:27 →