zoning
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 19
- Last 30 days
- 10
Discussed at 2 meetings in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 20, 2026.
Public comments (41)
Shared personal recovery experience at the Ohio House and how it transformed his life.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 1:19:32 →Shared the founding history of the Ohio House and its mission to help individuals recover from addiction.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 1:17:01 →Spoke in favor of the Ohio House conditional use permit, highlighting 15 years of successful recovery housing.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 1:11:45 →Expressed concern that Measure K and upcoming administrative choices reduce public participation in neighborhood land use decisions.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 26:56 →Complained about early morning noise pollution from a gym near her home impacting her husband's recovery.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 22:13 →Expressed concern about street tree trimming and traffic crashes along major corridors.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 2:46 →Shared personal recovery story and urged the council to approve the Ohio House to prevent displacement.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 1:31:26 →Supported the Ohio House, noting that residents contribute positively through employment and local business participation.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 1:29:55 →Expressed strong support for the Ohio House based on personal residency and employment experience.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 1:26:00 →Expressed concerns about sober living home separation requirements, precedent exceptions, and legal costs.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 1:23:28 →Argued that the zoning updates prioritize developer profits over community character, lack adequate infrastructure and traffic studies, and urged the Commission to adopt Alternative B (housing element sites only).
PLANNING COMMISSION — September 28, 2026 · 45:34 →Expressed concern that the plan would add 40,000 residents without a clear plan for open space or infrastructure, warning against turning Costa Mesa into a high-rise city.
PLANNING COMMISSION — September 28, 2026 · 48:58 →Supported staff recommendations, emphasizing that high land costs require buildings taller than four stories and that objective design standards are necessary to streamline housing production.
PLANNING COMMISSION — September 28, 2026 · 52:13 →Thanked staff and the Commission for years of hard work on the project and encouraged moving the suite of documents forward to the City Council.
PLANNING COMMISSION — September 28, 2026 · 54:10 →Criticized the planning process as a gift to developers and billionaires, arguing it betrays taxpayers and fails to secure adequate affordable housing and open space.
PLANNING COMMISSION — September 28, 2026 · 57:24 →Expressed faith in city staff and the planning process, noting that state mandates require housing and that zoning reforms on commercial corridors will create necessary development options.
PLANNING COMMISSION — September 28, 2026 · 1:00:30 →Noted that design standards and setbacks might reduce actual achievable densities on commercial redevelopment sites.
PLANNING COMMISSION — August 17, 2026 · 1:13:21 →Spoke on behalf of Wilson Meaney, supporting the housing initiatives while requesting flexibility in open space and street width standards for large projects.
PLANNING COMMISSION — August 17, 2026 · 2:36:12 →Expressed support for the proposed code revisions and long-term planning for North Costa Mesa properties.
PLANNING COMMISSION — August 17, 2026 · 2:34:09 →Requested that the city rezone district property on Adams Avenue from institutional to high-density residential.
PLANNING COMMISSION — July 27, 2026 · 1:37 →Expressed support on behalf of Lab Holding for the proposed zoning code amendments.
PLANNING COMMISSION — July 13, 2026 · 1:34:04 →Spoke in favor of increasing the small fitness studio size limit and noted that residents frequently bike or walk to neighborhood gyms.
PLANNING COMMISSION — July 13, 2026 · 1:33:20 →Expressed concern that the proposed 15,000-square-foot cap for fitness studios was too broad and could encompass large traditional gyms like Curl Fitness.
PLANNING COMMISSION — July 13, 2026 · 1:30:19 →Expressed strong support for the proposed code amendments to help modern businesses, but urged the commission to reduce parking requirements for small fitness studios.
PLANNING COMMISSION — June 22, 2026 · 1:32:00 →Expressed concerns about permit processing timelines, demo permit requirements, and urged the commission to track application submittal dates.
PLANNING COMMISSION — June 22, 2026 · 2:29 →Expressed disappointment over the council's failure to adopt an ethics code, highlighting increased legal and financial risks.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY* — April 21, 2026 · 30:02 →Criticized Measure K outreach meetings as controlled presentations and raised concerns about public comment deadlines.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 23, 2026 · 3:58 →Expressed concern that removing sites weakens the housing element and urged a cautious approach.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 23, 2026 · 3:08:59 →Requested that the Costa Mesa Women's Club property be removed from the housing element opportunity sites list.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 23, 2026 · 2:55:51 →Supported removing the Women's Club from the housing list, highlighting its century of community service.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 23, 2026 · 2:58:38 →Speaking for Segerstrom interests, urged prompt removal of their properties from the housing element to align plans and prevent legal complications.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:25:55 →Urged transparency and fairness, objecting to reduced noticing radiuses and advocating for community infrastructure planning.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:34:03 →Asserted that proposed changes to the reasonable accommodation ordinance still require adjustments to comply with fair housing law.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:30:56 →Spoke in support of increasing housing supply to address financial stress and affordability challenges faced by younger generations.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:27:31 →Requested staff to meet with their team to resolve technical inconsistencies between the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and proposed overlay standards.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:24:05 →Requested an interim path forward for non-Housing Element Measure K sites, noting hardship for small businesses forced to wait until November 2026.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 2:17:42 →Criticized public outreach and warned that high-density rezonings lack plans for parks, traffic, and public safety services.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:19:51 →Urged better public transparency, clearer draft documents, and thorough evaluation of traffic and pollution impacts before upzoning.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:16:27 →Representing South Coast Plaza, requested the removal of Segerstrom properties from the housing element due to legal uncertainties with overlay zoning.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:13:24 →Emphasized transparency, participatory governance, and the need for an ethics policy.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY* — January 20, 2026 · 1:07:45 →Expressed concerns about an unpermitted neighbor's deck violating privacy and fire safety.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY* — January 20, 2026 · 17:08 →