housing
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Permanent Supportive Housing and Community Services→At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 7
Rising — discussed at 3 meetings since Sep 1, 2026, up from 2 in the two months before.
Public comments (43)
Urged council to adopt the plan to address the urgent need for affordable housing.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 4:50:52 →Expressed concern that the zoning overhaul creates excessive density without adequate infrastructure planning.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 4:48:18 →Noted newly released SCAG housing allocation numbers and questioned impacts on planning.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 4:46:41 →Urged council to adopt the zoning changes to expand affordable housing and diversify neighborhoods.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 4:43:43 →Expressed strong support for the zoning overhaul and Measure K implementation.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 4:42:17 →Criticized the city's affordable housing costs and police/fire spending associated with low-income housing projects.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 37:20 →Urged adoption of the zoning plan to support lower-income working families facing high housing costs.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 20, 2026 · 4:52:43 →Shared personal challenges as a parent of a disabled son seeking appropriate residential care in Orange County, advocating for housing on state land.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — October 6, 2026 · 1:33:20 →Spoke in support of the Housing Element as recommended.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — September 1, 2026 · 3:05:05 →Spoke in opposition to the Housing Element due to legal deficiencies concerning individuals with disabilities.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — September 1, 2026 · 3:02:00 →Spoke in support of the Housing Element and affordable housing.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — September 1, 2026 · 3:00:30 →Requested inclusion of a property not currently identified as a Measure K site.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — September 1, 2026 · 2:59:00 →Spoke in support of the Housing Element item.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — September 1, 2026 · 2:57:30 →Expressed concerns about high density, high rises south of the 405, and in-lieu fees.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — September 1, 2026 · 3:11:16 →Spoke in support of the Housing Element amendments.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — September 1, 2026 · 2:55:15 →Expressed support for completing required zoning and approving the Housing Element.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — September 1, 2026 · 2:42:00 →Spoke in support of the Housing Element and strengthening the inclusionary housing ordinance.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — September 1, 2026 · 2:52:27 →Expressed concerns about lack of transparency, density, and piecemeal zoning without infrastructure planning.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — September 1, 2026 · 2:47:06 →Expressed concerns about EIR impacts, air quality, greenhouse gases, and heat effects.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — September 1, 2026 · 2:49:32 →Criticized the housing element and Measure K process as spot zoning that departs from original community visions and urged adopting Alternative B.
PLANNING COMMISSION — August 17, 2026 · 1:17:35 →Expressed concern about park space deficiencies associated with major developments like the Fairview Developmental Center and suggested incentivizing land dedication.
PLANNING COMMISSION — August 17, 2026 · 1:34 →Expressed interest in adding a car dealership site near Adams to the housing overlay, though noting density limits make affordable housing difficult.
PLANNING COMMISSION — August 17, 2026 · 1:13:21 →Asked about vacant dealership and gym sites and how Measure Y provisions interact with state-mandated affordable housing.
PLANNING COMMISSION — August 17, 2026 · 1:15:51 →Requested that 2148 Newport Boulevard be included in the housing element inventory.
PLANNING COMMISSION — August 17, 2026 · 1:20:45 →Questioned the grand jury report findings and discussed difficulties regarding state housing mandates and municipal lawsuits.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — August 4, 2026 · 1:26:03 →Expressed concern over a non-unanimous Finance and Pension Advisory Committee vote on the budget, questioned vacancy and overtime funding assumptions, and opposed eliminating the park ranger position.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — June 2, 2026 · 5:03:20 →Expressed concerns regarding housing element grant assumptions and strongly opposed eliminating the park ranger position due to safety and enforcement issues at Fairview Park.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — June 2, 2026 · 3:51:59 →Asked whether allocations are being made for unhoused or homeless individuals, prompting a discussion on permanent supportive housing.
PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION — April 9, 2026 · 18:05 →Requested clarification on the 200 permanent supportive housing units, specifically asking where they will be located and how they will be configured within the project.
PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION — April 9, 2026 · 1:09:11 →Expressed strong support for affordable housing and urged that the increased unit count (4,000 units) maintain the housing element's 40% affordability requirement for low and very low-income families.
PARKS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION — April 9, 2026 · 58:54 →Requested updates on the city's ethics policy and discussed challenges meeting RHNA housing numbers and park space requirements.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY* — March 17, 2026 · 16:10 →Urged better public transparency, clearer draft documents, and thorough evaluation of traffic and pollution impacts before upzoning.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:16:27 →Urged transparency and fairness, objecting to reduced noticing radiuses and advocating for community infrastructure planning.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:34:03 →Asserted that proposed changes to the reasonable accommodation ordinance still require adjustments to comply with fair housing law.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:30:56 →Representing South Coast Plaza, requested the removal of Segerstrom properties from the housing element due to legal uncertainties with overlay zoning.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:13:24 →Spoke in support of increasing housing supply to address financial stress and affordability challenges faced by younger generations.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:27:31 →Speaking for Segerstrom interests, urged prompt removal of their properties from the housing element to align plans and prevent legal complications.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:25:55 →Requested staff to meet with their team to resolve technical inconsistencies between the North Costa Mesa Specific Plan and proposed overlay standards.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:24:05 →Requested an interim path forward for non-Housing Element Measure K sites, noting hardship for small businesses forced to wait until November 2026.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 2:17:42 →Criticized public outreach and warned that high-density rezonings lack plans for parks, traffic, and public safety services.
PLANNING COMMISSION — February 9, 2026 · 1:19:51 →Requested city partnership and support to help bring an approved 46-unit affordable housing project online.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY* — February 3, 2026 · 11:00 →Supported new housing but asked about accessibility and bike infrastructure.
PLANNING COMMISSION — January 26, 2026 · 1:55:43 →Raised concerns about rezoning, traffic, and lack of transparency.
PLANNING COMMISSION — January 26, 2026 · 1:59:54 →News & external sources (10)
L.A. homes still cost far more than those in the suburbs. Why that's so surprising
Home prices in urban Los Angeles are far more expensive than those in the suburbs, despite a shift in homebuyers moving outward from the city, Redfin data show.
How California is fast-tracking construction of much-needed college student housing
California cuts red tape and exempts campus projects from environmental review to fast-track affordable college student housing.
Costa Mesa officials approve density bonus plan for 21 ownership units on 1.49 acres
By Sara Cardine Staff Writer Sept. 30, 2026 2:38 PM PT A plan to build 21 single-family homes on a 1.49-acre lot in Costa Mesa formerly occupied by a mobile home park sailed through the city’s planning c...
Costa Mesa okays 2,300 homes as California pursues its lawsuit
Costa Mesa okays 2,300 homes as California pursues its lawsuit HousingWire
Costa Mesa Approves Housing at Fairview Development Center
Costa Mesa’s Fairview Development Center is on track to see over 2,000 housing units get built on it – along with some open space – after state and local officials have grappled with exactly what to do with spr...
Costa Mesa leaders update required housing plan but question effectiveness of state methods
Costa Mesa leaders update required housing plan but question effectiveness of state methods Orange County Register
With state lawsuit deadline looming, Costa Mesa nears housing plan finish line
With state lawsuit deadline looming, Costa Mesa nears housing plan finish line Los Angeles Times
Costa Mesa blasts state housing mandates as overreaching and unreasonable
Costa Mesa blasts state housing mandates as overreaching and unreasonable Los Angeles Times
As Costa Mesa hunts for housing sites, college district offers up parcels for rezoning
As Costa Mesa hunts for housing sites, college district offers up parcels for rezoning Los Angeles Times
California sues 5 cities over housing goals
California sues 5 cities over housing goals Planetizen