Public Safety
Flock Surveillance Cameras
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Opposed (4)Concerned (1)
At a glance
- Public comments
- 5
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Jun 16, 2026.
Public comments (5)
OpposedAllison LinJun 16, 2026
Spoke against Flock cameras, arguing that data sharing with federal and out-of-state agencies violates SB 34 and exposes the city to major legal liability.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — June 16, 2026 · 1:02:00 →OpposedAnne StentonJun 16, 2026
Expressed concern over public funds spent on private surveillance technology and questioned city assurances regarding data sharing.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — June 16, 2026 · 56:03 →ConcernedJuana TrejoJun 16, 2026
Spoke on behalf of the immigrant community regarding fears of surveillance, drone activity, and safety concerns.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — June 16, 2026 · 1:00:17 →OpposedNicole PearsonJun 16, 2026
Argued as a constitutional attorney that automated surveillance creates unconstitutional searchable databases of innocent citizens and warned of potential litigation.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — June 16, 2026 · 1:17:27 →OpposedWendy LeeceJun 16, 2026
Criticized the council for not placing the Flock camera issue on the agenda for a vote.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL AND HOUSING AUTHORITY — June 16, 2026 · 14:07:20 →