CFD annexation
Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
At a glance
- Public comments
- 7
- Last 30 days
- 0
Last discussed Aug 11, 2026.
Public comments (20)
Said it was unfair the corrected resolution wasn't shared with affected residents before the vote and questioned transparency about who really pays the tax.
City Council Meeting · 1:08:04 →A 30-year St. Germain homeowner thanked the city for confirming there'll be no access from her quiet street.
City Council Meeting · 1:10:51 →Opposed the project, citing short-notice community meetings, added traffic, and construction crews starting before 8 a.m.
City Council Meeting · 1:13:01 →The applicant's rep said they'll keep the SDG&E gate as-is, comply with construction hours, and thanked the city and neighbors for collaborating.
City Council Meeting · 1:15:32 →Asked for better street lighting in the neighborhood, saying residents walk dogs at night in the dark.
City Council Meeting · 1:17:20 →Wanted written guarantees that the fence at the project will stay up and never reopen access to the public.
City Council Meeting · 1:19:31 →Criticized councilmember community meetings as unpublicized 'secret meetings' and said staff dropped the transparency of published comments and responses.
City Council Meeting · 1:21:10 →Spoke in opposition to the annexation.
City Council Meeting · 0:00 →Spoke in opposition to the annexation.
City Council Meeting · 0:00 →Spoke in opposition to the annexation.
City Council Meeting · 0:00 →Submitted written opposition, citing the report's language that the Improvement Area D special tax would last in perpetuity.
City Council Meeting · 0:00 →